MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.10.007

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of otolaryngology · 2010

Sutureless tympanoplasty using acellular dermis.

Raj Anoop, Sayal Ankush, Rathore P K, Meher Ravi

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A prospective randomized unblinded controlled trial was conducted by comparing acellular dermis with temporalis fascia as graft materials in tympanoplasty (type 1) in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, graft success rate, and audiologic outcome.

STUDY

DESIGN

Forty-two patients with (inactive) chronic suppurative otitis media of tubotympanic type were randomized, matched, and divided equally into 2 groups of 21 each. One group underwent tympanoplasty (type 1) via transcanal route using temporalis fascia graft and the other using acellular dermis. Both groups were compared for operative time, postoperative pain, graft success rate, and audiologic improvement in hearing.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant reduction in operative time (P < .05) and postoperative pain (P < .05) in the acellular dermis group. However, there was no statistical difference in graft success rate (P > .05) and hearing improvement (P > .05) between both the groups.

CONCLUSION

Results of tympanoplasty using acellular dermis as graft material are comparable to that using temporalis fascia in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement. However, tympanoplasty using acellular dermis has the advantage of shorter operative time and lesser postoperative pain.

Для цитирования: Raj Anoop, Sayal Ankush, Rathore P K, Meher Ravi. Sutureless tympanoplasty using acellular dermis.. American journal of otolaryngology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.10.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.