MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2024.07.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endodontics · 2024

Use of a Penrose Drain for Decompression of a Large Periapical Lesion: A Case Report With 4.5-Year Follow-up.

Wang Feng-Ming, Liang Hui, Glickman Gerald N, Gutmann James L

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Managing large cyst-like periapical lesions poses significant challenges, especially when nonsurgical treatment or retreatment options are ineffective. Despite its efficacy, decompression remains an underutilized minimally invasive alternative in modern dentistry. This case report describes the use of a Penrose drain for decompression following aspiration and irrigation to manage a large periapical lesion associated with a 56-year-old man's maxillary lateral incisor. The lesion had caused thinning and perforation of the facial and palatal cortical plates, as well as the inferior border of the nasal fossa. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to evaluate the lesion preoperatively and to assess the healing progress postoperatively. Complete 3-dimensional healing was observed after a subsequent root-end surgery performed 3.5 years post-decompression. This report suggests that decompression using a Penrose drain in combination with aspiration and irrigation could be a simple but effective modality for managing large cyst-like periapical lesions when nonsurgical endodontics are attempted and deemed ineffective.

Для цитирования: Wang Feng-Ming, Liang Hui, Glickman Gerald N, Gutmann James L. Use of a Penrose Drain for Decompression of a Large Periapical Lesion: A Case Report With 4.5-Year Follow-up.. Journal of endodontics. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.07.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.