MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5301/ru.2011.8865

Медицинская библиотека · Urologia · 2011

[Foreign bodies in urinary bladder: a clinical case].

Passaro Giovanna, Cappa Emanuele, D'Addessi Alessandro, Sacco Emilio, Bassi Pier Francesco

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

A pencil in the urinary bladder is an unusual problem for urologists. We present a case in a 44-year-old female with an eyeliner pencil self-introduced into the urethra.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The patient was referred to us with a recent history of "ingestion of foreign body". The clinical presentation, radiologic data, and treatment were reported.

RESULTS

The patient had a pencil placed sideways in the urinary bladder, with focal perforation of the left wall. A cystoscopy was performed and the pencil was removed at the same time by using grasping forceps and hydraulic overdistention of the urinary bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder is the most common location of foreign bodies of the urogenital tract, almost always due to self-insertion into the urethra for the purpose of masturbation or as a result of non-inhibited or altered behavior due to psychiatric diseases, or to the influence of drugs. Most patients were too ashamed to admit they had inserted or applied any object and usually presented when a complication had occurred such as difficulty in voiding, hematuria, pain or swelling, extravasations or abscess formation. The treatment can be endoscopic, and it depends on the type of the foreign object and the operator's skills.

Для цитирования: Passaro Giovanna, Cappa Emanuele, D'Addessi Alessandro, Sacco Emilio, Bassi Pier Francesco. [Foreign bodies in urinary bladder: a clinical case].. Urologia. 2011. DOI: 10.5301/ru.2011.8865.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.