Spinal cord · 2011
Quality of life and urological morbidity in tetraplegics with artificial ventilation managed with suprapubic or intermittent catheterisation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Böthig R, Hirschfeld S, Thietje R
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Mono-centric, retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of correlation between bladder management and age in respirator-dependant high-tetraplegic patients. Additionally suprapubic catheter (SPC) and intermittent catheterisation (IC) were reviewed concerning urological complications and quality of life (QoL).
SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre.
METHODS: A QoL questionnaire 'International Consultation on Incontinence' (ICIQ-SF) was sent to 56 tetraplegic respirator device-dependant (RDD)-spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Their scores concerning urological morbidity were reviewed. For analysis reasons they were divided in three groups: SPC, IC and others.
RESULTS: SPC 38, IC 12 and others 6 patients. Significant difference in age (SPC vs IC=49.9 vs 31.8 years) was observed but no disparity in gender. Within a follow-up period 2-26 years (median 8 years) significant urological complications in patients with IC (P<0.05) were ascertained. These were in general minor complications. Especially renal deterioration or bladder cancer was not diagnosed in any of the group. The questionnaire return rate was high (83.9%) with complete answers (SPC=32, IC=11). Self assessment of QoL with ICIQ-SF revealed no significant difference for both groups on low level, but SPC patients tend to score better.
CONCLUSION: In our study, tetraplegic RDD-SCI patients with SPC suffered less urological complications and tend to score a better QoL. Therefore we recommend SPC as a serious alternative for these selected patients and concurrently underline the necessity of close urological surveillance at least annually.
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of correlation between bladder management and age in respirator-dependant high-tetraplegic patients. Additionally suprapubic catheter (SPC) and intermittent catheterisation (IC) were reviewed concerning urological complications and quality of life (QoL).
SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre.
METHODS: A QoL questionnaire 'International Consultation on Incontinence' (ICIQ-SF) was sent to 56 tetraplegic respirator device-dependant (RDD)-spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. Their scores concerning urological morbidity were reviewed. For analysis reasons they were divided in three groups: SPC, IC and others.
RESULTS: SPC 38, IC 12 and others 6 patients. Significant difference in age (SPC vs IC=49.9 vs 31.8 years) was observed but no disparity in gender. Within a follow-up period 2-26 years (median 8 years) significant urological complications in patients with IC (P<0.05) were ascertained. These were in general minor complications. Especially renal deterioration or bladder cancer was not diagnosed in any of the group. The questionnaire return rate was high (83.9%) with complete answers (SPC=32, IC=11). Self assessment of QoL with ICIQ-SF revealed no significant difference for both groups on low level, but SPC patients tend to score better.
CONCLUSION: In our study, tetraplegic RDD-SCI patients with SPC suffered less urological complications and tend to score a better QoL. Therefore we recommend SPC as a serious alternative for these selected patients and concurrently underline the necessity of close urological surveillance at least annually.