Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2021
Evaluation and impact of fetal physiology training on fetal heart rate analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dupuis H, Ghesquière L, Pierache A, Subtil D, Houfflin-Debarge V, Garabedian C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of fetal well-being during labor is based on fetal heart rate (FHR) analysis, which requires physiology expertise. The aim of the present study was to assess medical residents' fetal physiology training in terms of theoretical knowledge, FHR interpretation, and use of second-line examinations.
METHODS: This single-center, prospective study of obstetrics and gynecology residents (N = 34) at CHU de Lille Hospital (Lille, France) was conducted from November 2017 to November 2018. Evaluation and training were conducted in three stages. First, residents' pre-training knowledge of FHR interpretation and use of fetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) was assessed using clinical cases. Second, a didactic training session on fetal physiology was delivered. Finally, post-training knowledge was evaluated using the same cases presented during pre-training. I: Pre-training, 3%, 11.8%, and 14.7% of residents considered their training on fetal physiology, FHR analysis, and second-line examinations, respectively, to be sufficient. Training significantly improved their theoretical knowledge, which was assessed using multiple-choice questions (median [interquartile range]: 1.5 [1.0-2.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.5], p<0.001), and reduced the number of FBS requested (36.3% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.002). Krippendorff's alpha coefficient for the reproducibility of residents' responses improved significantly, reflecting greater homogenization of clinical practice decisions (alpha [95% confidence interval]: 0.60 [0.55-0.65] vs. 0.72 [0.67-0.76]).
CONCLUSION: Improved fetal physiology knowledge promotes more accurate FHR interpretation, better indications for second-line examinations, and greater homogenization of clinical practice decisions. Future studies should evaluate the impact of fetal physiology training on clinical practice.
METHODS: This single-center, prospective study of obstetrics and gynecology residents (N = 34) at CHU de Lille Hospital (Lille, France) was conducted from November 2017 to November 2018. Evaluation and training were conducted in three stages. First, residents' pre-training knowledge of FHR interpretation and use of fetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) was assessed using clinical cases. Second, a didactic training session on fetal physiology was delivered. Finally, post-training knowledge was evaluated using the same cases presented during pre-training. I: Pre-training, 3%, 11.8%, and 14.7% of residents considered their training on fetal physiology, FHR analysis, and second-line examinations, respectively, to be sufficient. Training significantly improved their theoretical knowledge, which was assessed using multiple-choice questions (median [interquartile range]: 1.5 [1.0-2.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.5], p<0.001), and reduced the number of FBS requested (36.3% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.002). Krippendorff's alpha coefficient for the reproducibility of residents' responses improved significantly, reflecting greater homogenization of clinical practice decisions (alpha [95% confidence interval]: 0.60 [0.55-0.65] vs. 0.72 [0.67-0.76]).
CONCLUSION: Improved fetal physiology knowledge promotes more accurate FHR interpretation, better indications for second-line examinations, and greater homogenization of clinical practice decisions. Future studies should evaluate the impact of fetal physiology training on clinical practice.