MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102235

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025

Which is the fastest and safest approach? A comparison of time and complications of transparotid and anteroparotid retromandibular approach in management of mandibular subcondylar fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Bagchi Pareeksit, Sidana Sunil, Baviskar Padmakar, Natarajan Srivalli, Ahuja Suraj, Balkawade Ruchita

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular condylar fractures are among the most common facial fractures and its incidence has been rising since the past few decades. Although various approaches for management of mandibular condylar fractures have been described in literature there is a gap in the published literature when it comes to comparison of these approaches. There have only been a handful of studies which have compared use of Retromandibular Transparotid against Retromandibular anteroparotid approach in management of mandibular condylar fractures with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to aid in decision making regarding the choice of approach between the Retromandibular Transparotid and Anteroparotid Transmasseteric approach based on the ease of surgical access and incidence of complications.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 24 patients were registered in the study under two treatment groups, Transparotid (Group A) and Anteroparotid (Group B). Data collection was done by a single blinded observer for measurement of exposure time, facial nerve weakness, facial oedema, presence of a sialocele, presence of a parotid fistula (and presence of various complications).

RESULTS

The average time required for exposure of fracture site in group A was 11 min ± 2.73 min and in group B was 9 min ±1.91 min. Facial nerve injury (Grade III House Brackmann scale) was noted in one patient in group A. There was no significant difference in quality of reduction, occlusion and mandibular mobility.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the rate of complications and time required to access the fracture site was comparable in both the approaches. It can be said that both the anteroparotid and transparotid approaches are reasonably safe and convenient in management of mandibular condylar fractures.

Для цитирования: Bagchi Pareeksit, Sidana Sunil, Baviskar Padmakar, Natarajan Srivalli, Ahuja Suraj, Balkawade Ruchita. Which is the fastest and safest approach? A comparison of time and complications of transparotid and anteroparotid retromandibular approach in management of mandibular subcondylar fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial.. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102235.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.