International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019
Discrepancy between the European clinical guidelines and myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease in Russia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kiselev Anton R, Korotin Alexey S, Posnenkova Olga M, Popova Yulia V, Prokhorov Mikhail D, Gridnev Vladimir I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines, six indications have been proposed for making a decision on myocardial revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Our aim was to study a discrepancy between the actual clinical situation and ESC/EACTS indications on performing the revascularization in patients with CAD in Russia.
DESIGN AND SETTING: We used retrospective clinical data on patients with stable CAD enrolled in the 2012-2015 Russian Registry of Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Heart Failure.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1522 patients with CAD (aged 53.0 ± 8.5 years, 76.2% male) were used for analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients were divided into two groups: 591 patients with performed myocardial revascularization (named as R-CAD) and 931 patients refused from revascularization (named as NR-CAD). Factors associated with revascularization performance were identified by discriminant function analysis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ESC/EACTS indications for revascularization were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 1196 patients with CAD had any ESC/EACTS indication for revascularization, but only 40.2% of them had performed invasive coronary intervention. Myocardial revascularization was appropriate in 81.4% of R-CAD patients and 76.8% of NR-CAD patients. The main factor of revascularization performance was any stenosis >50% and grades III-IV of stable angina. With non-performed revascularization, the following factors were associated: limiting angina or angina equivalent, unresponsive to medical therapy, atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease and increasing the New York Heart Association class of chronic heart failure. Most ESC/EACTS indications had little effect on decision-making on revascularization.
CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between the actual clinical situation and ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization in patients with stable CAD in Russia.
DESIGN AND SETTING: We used retrospective clinical data on patients with stable CAD enrolled in the 2012-2015 Russian Registry of Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Heart Failure.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1522 patients with CAD (aged 53.0 ± 8.5 years, 76.2% male) were used for analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients were divided into two groups: 591 patients with performed myocardial revascularization (named as R-CAD) and 931 patients refused from revascularization (named as NR-CAD). Factors associated with revascularization performance were identified by discriminant function analysis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ESC/EACTS indications for revascularization were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 1196 patients with CAD had any ESC/EACTS indication for revascularization, but only 40.2% of them had performed invasive coronary intervention. Myocardial revascularization was appropriate in 81.4% of R-CAD patients and 76.8% of NR-CAD patients. The main factor of revascularization performance was any stenosis >50% and grades III-IV of stable angina. With non-performed revascularization, the following factors were associated: limiting angina or angina equivalent, unresponsive to medical therapy, atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease and increasing the New York Heart Association class of chronic heart failure. Most ESC/EACTS indications had little effect on decision-making on revascularization.
CONCLUSION: There is a discrepancy between the actual clinical situation and ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization in patients with stable CAD in Russia.