Frontiers in medicine · 2026
Amniotic membrane transplantation combined with cryotherapy vs. lamellar keratoplasty for medically refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis: a retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wan Jia, Bao Juan, Wang Cuiyu, Gao Ruiyao, Zhang Kai, Chen Yingxin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Medically refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) is a severe condition requiring urgent surgery. This study compares the clinical outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) combined with cryotherapy vs. lamellar keratoplasty (LKP) for this high-risk group.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with refractory PUK who underwent either AMT or LKP with a 12-month follow-up. Outcome measures included ulcer healing rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), epithelialization time, and recurrence rate.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (58 eyes) were included (AMT: n = 28; LKP: n = 30). Primary ulcer healing rates were comparable between the groups (AMT: 78.6%, LKP: 76.7%; P = 0.862). Both groups showed similar BCVA improvements up to 6 months postoperatively. However, the LKP group demonstrated significantly faster epithelialization (median 6 vs. 12 days; P < 0.05), superior BCVA at 12 months (P = 0.019), and a lower disease recurrence rate (10.0% vs. 32.1%; P = 0.038), although AMT demonstrated a superior safety profile with no procedure-related complications. Concurrent autoimmune diseases significantly prolonged epithelialization in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: LKP provides superior long-term optical/structural restoration and a lower recurrence rate, making it the definitive treatment for refractory PUK. However, AMT matches LKP in primary healing and mid-term efficacy. Amid global donor shortages, AMT serves as an invaluable, safe bridging therapy to stabilize the ocular surface and manage acute inflammation before definitive keratoplasty.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with refractory PUK who underwent either AMT or LKP with a 12-month follow-up. Outcome measures included ulcer healing rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), epithelialization time, and recurrence rate.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (58 eyes) were included (AMT: n = 28; LKP: n = 30). Primary ulcer healing rates were comparable between the groups (AMT: 78.6%, LKP: 76.7%; P = 0.862). Both groups showed similar BCVA improvements up to 6 months postoperatively. However, the LKP group demonstrated significantly faster epithelialization (median 6 vs. 12 days; P < 0.05), superior BCVA at 12 months (P = 0.019), and a lower disease recurrence rate (10.0% vs. 32.1%; P = 0.038), although AMT demonstrated a superior safety profile with no procedure-related complications. Concurrent autoimmune diseases significantly prolonged epithelialization in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: LKP provides superior long-term optical/structural restoration and a lower recurrence rate, making it the definitive treatment for refractory PUK. However, AMT matches LKP in primary healing and mid-term efficacy. Amid global donor shortages, AMT serves as an invaluable, safe bridging therapy to stabilize the ocular surface and manage acute inflammation before definitive keratoplasty.