The journal of sexual medicine · 2025
Efficacy of CO2 laser vs vaginal estrogen in perimenopausal women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause: systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nasr Aya Mohamed, Saad Mohab Alsaid, Mohamed Amer Salah, Hanafi Yousif Ahmad, Bazbaz Bilal Walid, Mohamed Sarra Salah Amer, Selim Sayed Mahmoud, Altawallbeh Zaid Fatehi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is characterized by vaginal dryness, itching, burning, pain during intercourse, and urinary symptoms. Traditionally, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), specifically estrogen therapy, has been the first-line treatment for GSM, due to its side effects, fractional CO2 laser therapy has emerged as an alternative for managing GSM symptoms.
AIM: The primary focus is to compare CO2 fractional laser therapy and estrogen therapy on postmenopausal women with GSM through systemically reviewing all the randomized controlled trials.Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, Scielo, UC Berkeley library, and Google Scholar, was performed in October 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted randomized controlled trials comparing CO2 fractional laser therapy and estrogen therapy on postmenopausal women with GSM, which used at least 1 of these outcomes: Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Vaginal Health Index, Visual Analog Score, and Urinary Distress Inventory 6.
RESULTS: Out of 688 studies, 7 studies were included for final analysis with a total of 302 participants: 154 had CO2 fractional laser therapy with a mean age of 55.9 years, and 148 had estrogen therapy with a mean age of 57.2 years. The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between CO2 laser and estrogen in Vaginal Health Index (mean difference [MD], 1.60; 95% CI, -0.36 to 3.56; P = .09), FSFI-total (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, -2.03 to 2.23; P = .93), and Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (MD, -3.18; 95% CI, -6.77 to 0.42; P = .08). We used a sensitivity analysis on the FSFI-arousal subscale due to high heterogeneity, excluding 1 study. It showed that the CO2 laser group had a statistically significant difference when compared with the estrogen group (MD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.15-0.79; P = .01).
CONCLUSION: CO2 laser therapy is an effective line of treatment for GSM. However, its comparison with estrogen therapy did not reach a statistically significant difference favoring one line over the other.
AIM: The primary focus is to compare CO2 fractional laser therapy and estrogen therapy on postmenopausal women with GSM through systemically reviewing all the randomized controlled trials.Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, Scielo, UC Berkeley library, and Google Scholar, was performed in October 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted randomized controlled trials comparing CO2 fractional laser therapy and estrogen therapy on postmenopausal women with GSM, which used at least 1 of these outcomes: Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Vaginal Health Index, Visual Analog Score, and Urinary Distress Inventory 6.
RESULTS: Out of 688 studies, 7 studies were included for final analysis with a total of 302 participants: 154 had CO2 fractional laser therapy with a mean age of 55.9 years, and 148 had estrogen therapy with a mean age of 57.2 years. The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between CO2 laser and estrogen in Vaginal Health Index (mean difference [MD], 1.60; 95% CI, -0.36 to 3.56; P = .09), FSFI-total (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, -2.03 to 2.23; P = .93), and Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (MD, -3.18; 95% CI, -6.77 to 0.42; P = .08). We used a sensitivity analysis on the FSFI-arousal subscale due to high heterogeneity, excluding 1 study. It showed that the CO2 laser group had a statistically significant difference when compared with the estrogen group (MD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.15-0.79; P = .01).
CONCLUSION: CO2 laser therapy is an effective line of treatment for GSM. However, its comparison with estrogen therapy did not reach a statistically significant difference favoring one line over the other.