Revue de pneumologie clinique · 2018
[Relevance of fluoroquinolones prescriptions in medical service].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lo Presti C, Blaise A, Maestracci M, Larue M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are antibiotics which favour the emergence of resistance and remain widely prescribed in the French hospital environment. A focus of prescription recommendation was published by the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) in 2015 in order to preserve their use. The pneumology-oriented medical service of Salon de Provence's hospital had high FQ consumption for the year 2015; thus a relevant assessment of prescriptions was carried out.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2015 and concerned patients who received at least one FQ administration during their hospitalization.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of the prescriptions were justified, 37 % were inappropriate and 25 % unjustified. The majority of unjustified prescriptions were for lung infections. Only 35 % of the patients received bacteriological documentation and 53 % of the prescriptions were reassessed at 48-72hours. Twenty-two per cent of the justified prescriptions showed non-conformities concerning the duration of prescriptions, the dosage or an association with another antibiotic.
CONCLUSION: The diffusion of these results, combined with the implementation of corrective actions, should make it possible to improve the relevance of the FQ prescription.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2015 and concerned patients who received at least one FQ administration during their hospitalization.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of the prescriptions were justified, 37 % were inappropriate and 25 % unjustified. The majority of unjustified prescriptions were for lung infections. Only 35 % of the patients received bacteriological documentation and 53 % of the prescriptions were reassessed at 48-72hours. Twenty-two per cent of the justified prescriptions showed non-conformities concerning the duration of prescriptions, the dosage or an association with another antibiotic.
CONCLUSION: The diffusion of these results, combined with the implementation of corrective actions, should make it possible to improve the relevance of the FQ prescription.