Transcanal Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: Is There a Difference in Perforation Closure Rates?

OBJECTIVE

To compare closure rates of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) as influenced by perforation size, perforation location, and graft position.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary university medical center.

PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent tympanoplasty by a fellowship-trained neurotologist from January 2010 to December 2019, had at least 2 months of follow-up, and had a tympanic perforation with no cholesteatoma before surgery.

INTERVENTIONS: Transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) or MT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is postoperative closure of the tympanic membrane perforation as assessed using otomicroscopy at the last follow-up appointment.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and eleven patients-98 in the transcanal ET group and 113 in the MT group-were identified. Tympanic membrane closure rates were not significantly different between the ET and MT groups (79.6% and 84.1% respectively; P = 0.473), and further multivariable analysis revealed that closure rates for ET relative to MT had an insignificant odds ratio (0.56; P = 0.144). Similar analyses also found no significant difference between the 2 methods in subsets of perforation size (small, large, subtotal/total), perforation location (anterior, posterior, inferior), and graft position (underlay, overlay).

CONCLUSIONS

ET resulted in similar rates of postoperative closure rates compared with the microscopic technique.