MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1258/0022215042450661

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2004

Multidimensional assessment of voice and speech after supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy.

Yücetürk Ali Vefa, Günhan Kivanç

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study was designed: to evaluate the vocal function in the patients with supracricoid laryngectomy (SCL) compared with normal subjects; to determine the factors affecting voice (such as number of arytenoid(s) preserved and movement of larynx and tongue base); and to determine the correlations between videolaryngostroboscopy, acoustic and perceptual parameters. Ten patients who underwent SCL with cricohyoidopexy for primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were included into the study. Vocal function was investigated by means or videolaryngostroboscopy. Voice quality was assessed by means of objective acoustic analysis and subjective perceptual ratings by trained raters. Aberrant, incompetent, and rough mucosal wave was observed in the anterior and superior surfaces of arytenoids(s), the inferior part of tongue base and the lateral walls of the hypopharynx. The acoustic parameters were found to be significantly different from those of normal subjects. The values of perceptual scores were approximately within 50 per cent of normal range. The number of arytenoids spared did not affect acoustic or perceptual measurements. A rough, breathy, unpleasant but intelligible and acceptable voice could be obtained after SCL with cricohyoidopexy.

Для цитирования: Yücetürk Ali Vefa, Günhan Kivanç. Multidimensional assessment of voice and speech after supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2004. DOI: 10.1258/0022215042450661.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.