MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.008

Медицинская библиотека · Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2023

Intensive care unit nurses' perception of three different methods for delirium screening: A survey (DELIS-3).

Nielsen Anne Højager, Larsen Laura Krone, Collet Marie Oxenbøll, Lehmkuhl Lene, Bekker Camilla, Jensen Janet Froulund, Laerkner Eva, Nielsen Tina Allerslev, Rossen Birgitte Sonne, Thorn Linette, Laursen Edel, Fischer Susanne, Villumsen Marianne, Shiv Louise Hvid, Høgh Marianne, Rahr Mette Nygaard, Svenningsen Helle

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common in critically ill patients with detrimental effects in terms of increased morbidity, mortality, costs, and human suffering. Delirium detection and management depends on systematic screening for delirium, which can be challenging to implement in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore how nurses in the intensive care unit perceived the use of Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit-7 (CAM-ICU-7), and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for delirium screening of patients in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, electronic-based survey of nurses' perceptions of delirium screening with the three different instruments for delirium screening. Nurses were asked to grade their perception of the usability of the three instruments and how well they were perceived to detect delirium and delirium symptom changes on a 1- to 6-point Likert scale. Open questions about perceived advantages and disadvantages of each instrument were analysed using the framework method.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven of 167 invited nurses completed the survey and rated the CAM-ICU-7 as faster and easier than the ICDSC, which was more nuanced and reflected changes in the patient's delirium better. Despite being rated as the fastest, easiest, and most used, the CAM-ICU provided less information and was considered inferior to the CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC. Using familiar instruments made delirium screening easier, but being able to grade and nuance the delirium assessment was experienced as important for clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the ICDSC and the CAM-ICU-7 were perceived well suited for detection of delirium and reflected changes in delirium intensity. The CAM-ICU was rated as fast and easy but inferior in its ability to grade and nuance the assessment of delirium. Emphasis on clinical meaningfulness and continued education in delirium screening are necessary for adherence to delirium management guidelines.

Для цитирования: Nielsen Anne Højager, Larsen Laura Krone, Collet Marie Oxenbøll, Lehmkuhl Lene, Bekker Camilla, Jensen Janet Froulund, Laerkner Eva, Nielsen Tina Allerslev, Rossen Birgitte Sonne, Thorn Linette, Laursen Edel, Fischer Susanne, Villumsen Marianne, Shiv Louise Hvid, Høgh Marianne, Rahr Mette Nygaard, Svenningsen Helle. Intensive care unit nurses' perception of three different methods for delirium screening: A survey (DELIS-3).. Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.