Metabolism: clinical and experimental · 2024
Comparative efficacy of THR-β agonists, FGF-21 analogues, GLP-1R agonists, GLP-1-based polyagonists, and Pan-PPAR agonists for MASLD: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеNetwork Meta-AnalysisПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Ru-Tao, Sun Qin-Mei, Xin Xin, Ng Cheng Han, Valenti Luca, Hu Yi-Yang, Zheng Ming-Hua, Feng Qin
Аннотация
AIMS: To compare the efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) agonists, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) analogues, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), GLP-1-based polyagonists, and pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (Pan-PPAR) agonists in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
METHODS: A database search for relevant randomized double-blind controlled trials published until July 11, 2024, was conducted. Primary outcomes were the relative change in hepatic fat fraction (HFF) and liver stiffness assessed non-invasively by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction and elastography. Secondary outcomes included histology, liver injury index, lipid profile, glucose metabolism, blood pressure, and body weight.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials (5357 patients with MASLD) were identified. For HFF reduction, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective (mean difference [MD] -51.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -68.25 to -34.68; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 84.9) vs. placebo, followed by FGF-21 analogues (MD -47.08; 95 % CI: -58.83 to -35.34; SUCRA 75.5), GLP-1R agonists (MD -37.36; 95 % CI: -69.52 to -5.21; SUCRA 52.3) and THR-β agonists (MD -33.20; 95 % CI: -43.90 to -22.51; SUCRA 36.9). For liver stiffness, FGF-21 analogues were most potentially effective (MD -9.65; 95 % CI: -19.28 to -0.01; SUCRA 82.2) vs. placebo, followed by THR-β agonists (MD -5.79; 95 % CI: -9.50 to -2.09; SUCRA 58.2), and GLP-1RAs (MD -5.58; 95 % CI: -15.02 to 3.86; SUCRA 54.7). For fibrosis improvement in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by FGF-21 analogues, THR-β agonists, Pan-PPAR agonists, and GLP-1R agonists; For MASH resolution in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by THR-β agonists, GLP-1R agonists, FGF-21 analogues, and Pan-PPAR agonists. THR-β agonists are well-balanced in liver steatosis and fibrosis, and excel at improving lipid profiles; FGF-21 analogues are effective at improving steatosis and particularly exhibit strong antifibrotic abilities. GLP-1R agonists showed significant benefits in improving liver steatosis, glucose metabolism, and body weight. GLP-1-based polyagonists have demonstrated the most potential efficacy overall in terms of comprehensive curative effect. Pan-PPAR agonists showed distinct advantages in improving liver function and glucose metabolism.
CONCLUSION: These results illustrate the relative superiority of the five classes of therapy in the treatment of MASLD and may serve as guidance for the development of combination therapies.
METHODS: A database search for relevant randomized double-blind controlled trials published until July 11, 2024, was conducted. Primary outcomes were the relative change in hepatic fat fraction (HFF) and liver stiffness assessed non-invasively by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction and elastography. Secondary outcomes included histology, liver injury index, lipid profile, glucose metabolism, blood pressure, and body weight.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials (5357 patients with MASLD) were identified. For HFF reduction, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective (mean difference [MD] -51.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -68.25 to -34.68; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 84.9) vs. placebo, followed by FGF-21 analogues (MD -47.08; 95 % CI: -58.83 to -35.34; SUCRA 75.5), GLP-1R agonists (MD -37.36; 95 % CI: -69.52 to -5.21; SUCRA 52.3) and THR-β agonists (MD -33.20; 95 % CI: -43.90 to -22.51; SUCRA 36.9). For liver stiffness, FGF-21 analogues were most potentially effective (MD -9.65; 95 % CI: -19.28 to -0.01; SUCRA 82.2) vs. placebo, followed by THR-β agonists (MD -5.79; 95 % CI: -9.50 to -2.09; SUCRA 58.2), and GLP-1RAs (MD -5.58; 95 % CI: -15.02 to 3.86; SUCRA 54.7). For fibrosis improvement in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by FGF-21 analogues, THR-β agonists, Pan-PPAR agonists, and GLP-1R agonists; For MASH resolution in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by THR-β agonists, GLP-1R agonists, FGF-21 analogues, and Pan-PPAR agonists. THR-β agonists are well-balanced in liver steatosis and fibrosis, and excel at improving lipid profiles; FGF-21 analogues are effective at improving steatosis and particularly exhibit strong antifibrotic abilities. GLP-1R agonists showed significant benefits in improving liver steatosis, glucose metabolism, and body weight. GLP-1-based polyagonists have demonstrated the most potential efficacy overall in terms of comprehensive curative effect. Pan-PPAR agonists showed distinct advantages in improving liver function and glucose metabolism.
CONCLUSION: These results illustrate the relative superiority of the five classes of therapy in the treatment of MASLD and may serve as guidance for the development of combination therapies.