Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2023
Unidirectional conduction characterizing epicardial connections in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoshida Kentaro, Hasebe Hideyuki, Hattori Masayuki, Hanaki Yuichi, Tsumagari Yasuaki, Baba Masako, Nogami Akihiko, Takeyasu Noriyuki
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Electrophysiological characteristics of epicardial connections (ECs) in atria and pulmonary veins (PVs) are unclear despite their important contributions to atrial fibrillation (AF). Unidirectional conduction associated with source-sink mismatch can occur in ECs due to their fine fibers with abrupt changes in orientation. We detailed the prevalence and electrophysiological characteristics of unidirectional conduction in the atria and investigated its association with the clinical manifestation of AF.
METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed electrophysiological studies and radiofrequency catheter ablation in 261 consecutive patients with AF.
RESULTS: Unidirectional conduction was observed during ablation encircling the PVs in eight (3.1%) patients, and all occurred in the suspected (N = 4) or definitively (N = 4) recognized ECs. These ECs included three intercaval bundles, four septopulmonary bundles, and one Marshall bundle, and were first manifested in a second procedure in 6 (75%) patients. The unidirectional property was from PV to atrium (exit conduction) in all intercaval bundles and three septopulmonary bundles, and from atrium to PV (entrance conduction) in the remaining two bundles. Intercaval bundles acted as a limb of bi-atrial macro-reentrant tachycardia (50%, three of the six including previous cases). Ablation of the exit outside the PVs, including the right atrium, eliminated ECs in three (38%) patients. All patients remain free from arrhythmia recurrence after a mean 13-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: A unidirectional conduction property was closely associated with the EC, as estimated by histological findings. Recognition of this fact by electrophysiologists may help to clarify mechanisms for AF and atrial tachycardia and guide the creation of efficient and safe ablation lesion sets.
METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed electrophysiological studies and radiofrequency catheter ablation in 261 consecutive patients with AF.
RESULTS: Unidirectional conduction was observed during ablation encircling the PVs in eight (3.1%) patients, and all occurred in the suspected (N = 4) or definitively (N = 4) recognized ECs. These ECs included three intercaval bundles, four septopulmonary bundles, and one Marshall bundle, and were first manifested in a second procedure in 6 (75%) patients. The unidirectional property was from PV to atrium (exit conduction) in all intercaval bundles and three septopulmonary bundles, and from atrium to PV (entrance conduction) in the remaining two bundles. Intercaval bundles acted as a limb of bi-atrial macro-reentrant tachycardia (50%, three of the six including previous cases). Ablation of the exit outside the PVs, including the right atrium, eliminated ECs in three (38%) patients. All patients remain free from arrhythmia recurrence after a mean 13-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: A unidirectional conduction property was closely associated with the EC, as estimated by histological findings. Recognition of this fact by electrophysiologists may help to clarify mechanisms for AF and atrial tachycardia and guide the creation of efficient and safe ablation lesion sets.