The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2025
Comparative outcomes of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in patients with dry central perforation following chronic suppurative otitis media.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Badr Khalid, Raza Syed, Radwan Sarah, Alqarni Basil, Alghamdi Asail, Aljahdali Mutep, Shaheen Mohammed, Alghamdi Saeed, Alghamdi Fares
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study compared endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty regarding surgical duration and clinical outcomes for chronic suppurative otitis media.
METHODS: Retrospective study included patients who underwent either endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty at King Abdullah Medical City between January 2020 and May 2022. It compared the groups' surgical duration, residual perforation incidence, post-operative pain and audiological outcomes.
RESULTS: The study included 58 patients, 29 of whom underwent endoscopic and 29 underwent microscopic tympanoplasty. Endoscopic tympanoplasty had a significantly shorter average surgical duration (75.46 ± 21.04 minutes) than microscopic (126.66 ± 34.27 minutes). Non-significant differences were detected between groups regarding residual perforation, post-operative pain or hearing improvements.
CONCLUSION: Both procedures resulted in non-significant differences regarding hearing and surgical complications. However, endoscopic tympanoplasty had a significantly shorter surgical duration, making it a preferable option due to reducing time required. Further randomized studies should be conducted to answer which approach is superior.
METHODS: Retrospective study included patients who underwent either endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty at King Abdullah Medical City between January 2020 and May 2022. It compared the groups' surgical duration, residual perforation incidence, post-operative pain and audiological outcomes.
RESULTS: The study included 58 patients, 29 of whom underwent endoscopic and 29 underwent microscopic tympanoplasty. Endoscopic tympanoplasty had a significantly shorter average surgical duration (75.46 ± 21.04 minutes) than microscopic (126.66 ± 34.27 minutes). Non-significant differences were detected between groups regarding residual perforation, post-operative pain or hearing improvements.
CONCLUSION: Both procedures resulted in non-significant differences regarding hearing and surgical complications. However, endoscopic tympanoplasty had a significantly shorter surgical duration, making it a preferable option due to reducing time required. Further randomized studies should be conducted to answer which approach is superior.