Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
Comparison of image quality and depiction of microscopic fat at 2-D and 3-D T1-Weighted (T1W) chemical shift (dual-echo) MRI for evaluation of adrenal adenomas.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alfaleh Hana, Melkus Gerd, Nasiyabi Khalid Alo, McInnes Matthew D F, Schieda Nicola
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality and detection of microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas imaged with 2-D and 3-D chemical shift imaging (CSI) and, to derive parameters which best match 2-D and 3-D-CSI.
METHODS: This two-phase, retrospective, and phantom + prospective study was IRB approved. First, a retrospective assessment of 50 consecutive adrenal adenomas imaged at 1.5 T with 2-D (TR minimum, Flip Angle [FA] 70°, TE 2.2/4.4 ms.) and 3-D (TR minimum, FA 10°, TE 2.2/4.4 ms.] CSI was performed. Second, phantom (varied fat: water concentration) experiments guided a prospective assessment of 12 consecutive adrenal adenomas imaged at 1.5 T with 3-D CSI (FA 10°, 18°). Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated: image quality, signal intensity (SI) cancellation (5-point Likert scale), and CSI-index ([SI.In.Phase-SI.Opposed.Phase/SI.In.Phase]*100).
RESULTS: 2-D-CSI yielded higher image quality (p < 0.001) and, subjectively (p < 0.001) and quantitatively (p < 0.001) had more SI cancellation from microscopic fat. Proportion of adenomas with no detectable microscopic fat (3-D; 26-36% subjectively, 18-24% quantitatively [CSI-index < 16.5%] versus 2-D; 20-22% subjectively, 6-8% quantitatively) differed (p = 0.008-0.08 subjectively, 0.008-0.03 quantitatively) by CSI technique. Phantom experiments indicated 18°FA 3-D-CSI compared favorably to 70° 2-D-CSI for fat detection between 5% and 50%. In vivo, there was no differences in subjective or quantitative SI cancellation comparing 18°3D-CSI and 2D-CSI (p = 0.16-0.56 and 0.73-0.60). Greater SI cancellation occurred with 18°3D compared to 10°3D-CSI evaluated subjectively (p = 0.003-0.01).
CONCLUSION: 2-D CSI has subjectively higher image quality and shows more signal intensity loss from microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas compared to 10° flip angle 3-D-CSI. Increasing the 3-D flip angle to 18° more closely matches depiction of microscopic fat to 2-D-CSI at 1.5 T.
METHODS: This two-phase, retrospective, and phantom + prospective study was IRB approved. First, a retrospective assessment of 50 consecutive adrenal adenomas imaged at 1.5 T with 2-D (TR minimum, Flip Angle [FA] 70°, TE 2.2/4.4 ms.) and 3-D (TR minimum, FA 10°, TE 2.2/4.4 ms.] CSI was performed. Second, phantom (varied fat: water concentration) experiments guided a prospective assessment of 12 consecutive adrenal adenomas imaged at 1.5 T with 3-D CSI (FA 10°, 18°). Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated: image quality, signal intensity (SI) cancellation (5-point Likert scale), and CSI-index ([SI.In.Phase-SI.Opposed.Phase/SI.In.Phase]*100).
RESULTS: 2-D-CSI yielded higher image quality (p < 0.001) and, subjectively (p < 0.001) and quantitatively (p < 0.001) had more SI cancellation from microscopic fat. Proportion of adenomas with no detectable microscopic fat (3-D; 26-36% subjectively, 18-24% quantitatively [CSI-index < 16.5%] versus 2-D; 20-22% subjectively, 6-8% quantitatively) differed (p = 0.008-0.08 subjectively, 0.008-0.03 quantitatively) by CSI technique. Phantom experiments indicated 18°FA 3-D-CSI compared favorably to 70° 2-D-CSI for fat detection between 5% and 50%. In vivo, there was no differences in subjective or quantitative SI cancellation comparing 18°3D-CSI and 2D-CSI (p = 0.16-0.56 and 0.73-0.60). Greater SI cancellation occurred with 18°3D compared to 10°3D-CSI evaluated subjectively (p = 0.003-0.01).
CONCLUSION: 2-D CSI has subjectively higher image quality and shows more signal intensity loss from microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas compared to 10° flip angle 3-D-CSI. Increasing the 3-D flip angle to 18° more closely matches depiction of microscopic fat to 2-D-CSI at 1.5 T.