Annals of plastic surgery · 2015
Limited incision with thorough elevation palatoplasty: technical evolution for superior results in cleft repair of the secondary palate.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baek Rong-Min, Koo Youn-Taek, Kim Baek-kyu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: All kinds of palatoplasty emphasize elongating the soft palate and reconstructing the velar musculature without complication. We present the limited incision with thorough elevation (LITE) palatoplasty that leaves the anterior margin of the hard palate intact, achieving a fully movable bipedicled flap for complete closure and an adequate functioning velar muscular sling.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients consecutively underwent the LITE palatoplasty. The patients were diagnosed with varying degrees of cleft of the secondary palate. The length of the soft palate was measured, preoperatively and postoperatively, to quantify the lengthening effect of the surgical procedure. The LITE palatoplasty lengthens the soft palate by full mobilization of the velar musculature and reconstruction of the muscles. The LITE palatoplasty also completely repairs the hard palate and leaves no raw surfaces, which can be disadvantageous to the maxillary growth.
RESULTS: The average length of soft palate was 18.5±3.1 mm preoperatively, and the increased length of the soft palate was 5.06±2.41 mm (27.3±17.4%). There were no complications including fistula formation, hematoma, or wound problems. After 2 years of operation, only 2 patients who had multiple congenital problems showed grade 1 hypernasality in speech assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: The LITE palatoplasty gives satisfactory results in elongating the soft palate and reconstructing a functional velar sling without leaving any raw surfaces that can be detrimental to healing and facial growth. And there was a better speech outcome without complications.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients consecutively underwent the LITE palatoplasty. The patients were diagnosed with varying degrees of cleft of the secondary palate. The length of the soft palate was measured, preoperatively and postoperatively, to quantify the lengthening effect of the surgical procedure. The LITE palatoplasty lengthens the soft palate by full mobilization of the velar musculature and reconstruction of the muscles. The LITE palatoplasty also completely repairs the hard palate and leaves no raw surfaces, which can be disadvantageous to the maxillary growth.
RESULTS: The average length of soft palate was 18.5±3.1 mm preoperatively, and the increased length of the soft palate was 5.06±2.41 mm (27.3±17.4%). There were no complications including fistula formation, hematoma, or wound problems. After 2 years of operation, only 2 patients who had multiple congenital problems showed grade 1 hypernasality in speech assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: The LITE palatoplasty gives satisfactory results in elongating the soft palate and reconstructing a functional velar sling without leaving any raw surfaces that can be detrimental to healing and facial growth. And there was a better speech outcome without complications.