JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2004
Pump-assisted enteral nutrition can prevent aspiration in bedridden percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shang Edward, Geiger Nicole, Sturm Joerg W, Post Stefan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vomiting, aspiration, and pneumonia are serious side effects in enteral feeding via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which often leads to hospitalization. To this day, it has not been proven whether pump-assisted (PA) or gravity-controlled application is the safer method for long-term feeding via PEG in bedridden patients.
METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized crossover study. Fifty bedridden PEG patients were fed using the pump-assisted method (G1) and 50 patients were fed using the gravity-controlled feeding method (G2). After 6 weeks of observation (O1), the feeding methods in both groups were switched, followed by another 6 weeks of observation (O2). Daily recording was done using a standardized questionnaire. The glucose levels during O1 and O2 were determined on days 1, 21, and 42.
RESULTS: The patients in both groups were compatible in age, sex, and medical illness. By comparing G1 and G2, a significantly lower regurgitation rate (p < .0002), vomiting of feeding substrate (p < .009), aspiration (p < .01), and pneumonia (p < .02) was observed. The diarrhea rate in G2 was higher than in G1 (p < .007). The glucose profiles in G1 showed a significantly better development (p < .0007) than the ones in G2. After switching the application method in G2, the PA group (now G2) showed a significantly improved rate of regurgitation, vomiting, aspiration, and diarrhea and improved glucose profiles.
CONCLUSION: Feeding via PA shows improved safety, which is documented in a lower rate of diarrhea, regurgitation, vomiting, and aspiration. PA also noted a more effective glucose metabolization, which results in better glucose levels. As a result of this prospective study, pump-assisted feeding is recommended for bedridden patients requiring long-term feeding via PEG.
METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized crossover study. Fifty bedridden PEG patients were fed using the pump-assisted method (G1) and 50 patients were fed using the gravity-controlled feeding method (G2). After 6 weeks of observation (O1), the feeding methods in both groups were switched, followed by another 6 weeks of observation (O2). Daily recording was done using a standardized questionnaire. The glucose levels during O1 and O2 were determined on days 1, 21, and 42.
RESULTS: The patients in both groups were compatible in age, sex, and medical illness. By comparing G1 and G2, a significantly lower regurgitation rate (p < .0002), vomiting of feeding substrate (p < .009), aspiration (p < .01), and pneumonia (p < .02) was observed. The diarrhea rate in G2 was higher than in G1 (p < .007). The glucose profiles in G1 showed a significantly better development (p < .0007) than the ones in G2. After switching the application method in G2, the PA group (now G2) showed a significantly improved rate of regurgitation, vomiting, aspiration, and diarrhea and improved glucose profiles.
CONCLUSION: Feeding via PA shows improved safety, which is documented in a lower rate of diarrhea, regurgitation, vomiting, and aspiration. PA also noted a more effective glucose metabolization, which results in better glucose levels. As a result of this prospective study, pump-assisted feeding is recommended for bedridden patients requiring long-term feeding via PEG.