MedElevator
Войти в исследования Acta oto-laryngologica · 2022
Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty: comparison of the effects of three different thicknesses grafts.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Qinshuang, Jin Lanlan, Song Xiaoxiao, Zheng Haifeng, Huang Yideng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The effects of graft thickness on tympanoplasty is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of endoscopic tympanoplasty using different thicknesses of autologous tissues.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 186 patients who received type I tympanoplasty, divided into three main groups based of grafting material: perichondrium (A), cartilage-perichondrium (B), or cartilage-perichondrium plus additional perichondrium (C). Group A was subdivided based on whether the placement was inside (A1) or outside (A2) of the malleus. The hearing improvement, graft success rate, and surgery duration were analysed.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed significant hearing improvement in the three main groups (p < .001); recovery in group A occurred the earliest. Six months postoperatively, group A1 showed significantly greater hearing recovery compared with groups B and C (p < .05). There were no statistical differences the other groups (p > .05) or in the graft success rate among the three main groups (p = .235). The surgery duration of group A was significantly longer than that of groups B and C (p < .001).
CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that graft thickness affects hearing recovery; however, graft thickness does not affect the rate of grafting success. Endoscopic transplantation of the perichondrium is more difficult and requires more time.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of endoscopic tympanoplasty using different thicknesses of autologous tissues.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 186 patients who received type I tympanoplasty, divided into three main groups based of grafting material: perichondrium (A), cartilage-perichondrium (B), or cartilage-perichondrium plus additional perichondrium (C). Group A was subdivided based on whether the placement was inside (A1) or outside (A2) of the malleus. The hearing improvement, graft success rate, and surgery duration were analysed.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed significant hearing improvement in the three main groups (p < .001); recovery in group A occurred the earliest. Six months postoperatively, group A1 showed significantly greater hearing recovery compared with groups B and C (p < .05). There were no statistical differences the other groups (p > .05) or in the graft success rate among the three main groups (p = .235). The surgery duration of group A was significantly longer than that of groups B and C (p < .001).
CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that graft thickness affects hearing recovery; however, graft thickness does not affect the rate of grafting success. Endoscopic transplantation of the perichondrium is more difficult and requires more time.