The Laryngoscope · 1999
A new technique for laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty: decision-tree analysis and results.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Remacle M, Betsch C, Lawson G, Jamart J, Eloy P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Report a new technique of laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP) for snoring performed as a one-stage procedure.
STUDY DESIGN: A decision-tree was used in a prospective study of 89 patients from April 1994 to May 1997. It included a fiberscopy and Muller's maneuver, rhinomanometry, pH monitoring, computed tomography scan to measure the pharyngeal lumen, pulse oximetry, and polysomnography in case of sleep apnea syndrome was suspected.
METHODS: The authors performed their LAUP technique on 43 patients (48.5%) whose snoring was mainly caused by the velum. This technique consists of scarifying the velum by vaporizing the mucosa and the submucosa along a rectangle extending from the palatal dimple to the uvula and having a width of 1.5 to 2 cm. Vaporization of the palatal arches follows without exceeding the junction of the anterior and posterior pillars in height. The uvula is cut if necessary, preserving a length of at least 0.5 cm. The other patients underwent different procedures according to the cause of snoring.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LAUP and uvulopalatoplasty (UPPP) regarding pain. No permanent phonatory disorders and no regurgitation occurred. Satisfaction evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 10 was equivalent for the two techniques: mean value = 7.68 (+/-2.18) for LAUP and 8.60 (+/-2.27) for UPPP. The mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 1-37 mo). Satisfaction was also identical for all techniques.
CONCLUSION: Our LAUP technique combined with other procedures according to a decision-tree is efficient and safe.
STUDY DESIGN: A decision-tree was used in a prospective study of 89 patients from April 1994 to May 1997. It included a fiberscopy and Muller's maneuver, rhinomanometry, pH monitoring, computed tomography scan to measure the pharyngeal lumen, pulse oximetry, and polysomnography in case of sleep apnea syndrome was suspected.
METHODS: The authors performed their LAUP technique on 43 patients (48.5%) whose snoring was mainly caused by the velum. This technique consists of scarifying the velum by vaporizing the mucosa and the submucosa along a rectangle extending from the palatal dimple to the uvula and having a width of 1.5 to 2 cm. Vaporization of the palatal arches follows without exceeding the junction of the anterior and posterior pillars in height. The uvula is cut if necessary, preserving a length of at least 0.5 cm. The other patients underwent different procedures according to the cause of snoring.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LAUP and uvulopalatoplasty (UPPP) regarding pain. No permanent phonatory disorders and no regurgitation occurred. Satisfaction evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 10 was equivalent for the two techniques: mean value = 7.68 (+/-2.18) for LAUP and 8.60 (+/-2.27) for UPPP. The mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 1-37 mo). Satisfaction was also identical for all techniques.
CONCLUSION: Our LAUP technique combined with other procedures according to a decision-tree is efficient and safe.