Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026
Effect of Total Crown and Veneer Zirconia Meso-Structure Designs on Anterior Implant-Supported Restorations: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Andrade Guilherme Schmitt, Formighieri Luis Alberto, Aragonez Gabriela Carrão, Augusto Marina Gullo, Mendes Tribst João Paulo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Unfavorable implant positioning in esthetic zones may result in buccal or incisal emergence of the prosthetic screw access, requiring alternative restorative strategies. This study evaluated, by three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA), the effect of total crown and laminated veneer zirconia meso-structure designs cemented onto a titanium base (Ti-base) on stress distribution and bone microstrain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two zirconia meso-structure designs: total crown (TC) and laminated veneer (LV) were simulated on a Ti-base using previously validated models. A 20 Ncm screw torque and a 150 N oblique load at 30° were applied. Stress was analyzed using von Mises and maximum principal stress, and bone response by microstrain.
RESULTS: Both designs showed similar stress distribution in the implant, Ti-base, and screw. Microstrain concentrated mainly in the peri-implant cortical bone, with slightly wider distribution in the LV model.
CONCLUSIONS: TC and LV meso-structures exhibited comparable biomechanical behavior, suggesting that their selection may be guided primarily by restorative and esthetic considerations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two zirconia meso-structure designs: total crown (TC) and laminated veneer (LV) were simulated on a Ti-base using previously validated models. A 20 Ncm screw torque and a 150 N oblique load at 30° were applied. Stress was analyzed using von Mises and maximum principal stress, and bone response by microstrain.
RESULTS: Both designs showed similar stress distribution in the implant, Ti-base, and screw. Microstrain concentrated mainly in the peri-implant cortical bone, with slightly wider distribution in the LV model.
CONCLUSIONS: TC and LV meso-structures exhibited comparable biomechanical behavior, suggesting that their selection may be guided primarily by restorative and esthetic considerations.