Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2018
Cecal duplication: A mimicker of intussusception: A case report and review.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Radhakrishna Veerabhadra, Rijhwani Ashok, Jadhav Bhushanrao
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cecal duplication is a rare congenital anomaly and to the best of our knowledge, only 43 cases have been reported in the literature till date. Most of them present within the first year of life. They can mimic intussusception, and the delay in diagnosis can lead to high morbidity.
CASE REPORT: A five-year boy presented with pain abdomen for a week. He was found to have ileocolic intussusception. The intussusception could only be partially reduced by the hydrostatic method. On laparotomy, a submucosal solid mass was found in the cecum with multiple enlarged lymph nodes. Mass was resected with clear margins and lymph nodes sampled. Histopathology was conclusive of cecal duplication. Post-operative course was uneventful, and the child is thriving well, last reviewed at three-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Incomplete reduction of intussusception, intussusception with atypical presentation or intussusception in atypical age group should alert to the possibility of cecal duplication.
CASE REPORT: A five-year boy presented with pain abdomen for a week. He was found to have ileocolic intussusception. The intussusception could only be partially reduced by the hydrostatic method. On laparotomy, a submucosal solid mass was found in the cecum with multiple enlarged lymph nodes. Mass was resected with clear margins and lymph nodes sampled. Histopathology was conclusive of cecal duplication. Post-operative course was uneventful, and the child is thriving well, last reviewed at three-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Incomplete reduction of intussusception, intussusception with atypical presentation or intussusception in atypical age group should alert to the possibility of cecal duplication.