MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95533-2

Медицинская библиотека · Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology · 1996

Wrist tremor: investigation of agonist-antagonist interaction by means of long-term EMG recording and cross-spectral analysis.

Boose A, Spieker S, Jentgens C, Dichgans J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We have developed a method to observe and quantify the phasic relationship between the burst patterns of antagonistic muscles in any roughly periodic movement, such as tremor, for up to 24 h. This paper describes our approach, in which long-term EMG recordings are evaluated by a procedure based on cross-spectral analysis. The method is then illustrated by data from 6 patients with essential tremor. Our data confirm earlier observations that a particular patient may show different burst patterns at different times. However, as opposed to tremor analysis based on short-term recording, our method allows quantitative statements on the relative frequency of the burst patterns, as they occur under everyday conditions. In addition, our data suggest that in ET (a) alternating tremor activity in one hand may occur simultaneously with synchronous activity in the other hand; (b) along with the classical alternating and co-contracting patterns there may be significant 'non-classical' activity, that cannot be called alternating or synchronous.

Для цитирования: Boose A, Spieker S, Jentgens C, Dichgans J. Wrist tremor: investigation of agonist-antagonist interaction by means of long-term EMG recording and cross-spectral analysis.. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95533-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.