Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Calcitonin Stimulation Tests for Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Calcium Gluconate vs. Calcium Chloride.

Background

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare malignancy derived from parafollicular C-cells, with calcitonin (Ct) as its key biomarker. While basal Ct (bCt) levels above 100 pg/mL strongly suggest MTC, intermediate elevations (10-100 pg/mL) may reflect C-cell hyperplasia (CCH) or other benign conditions, making diagnostics challenging. Although calcium stimulation testing enhances sensitivity, the optimal cut-off values and comparative efficacy of calcium gluconate (CG) versus calcium chloride (CC) remain insufficiently researched.

Methods

Data on 176 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy between 2009 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. BCt values ranged from 10 to 100 pg/mL, and stimulated Ct (sCt) values were above 100 pg/mL. CG was used from 2009 to 2019, and CC was used from 2020 to 2025. Definitive pathohistological findings divided patients into those with MTC, CCH, or no C-cell pathology. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal Ct thresholds for predicting MTC for each stimulatory agent.

Results

Of the 176 patients, 36 (20.5%) had confirmed MTC. A bCt threshold of 31.1 pg/mL yielded 69.4% sensitivity and 87.1% specificity. For sCt, optimal cut-offs were 810.8 pg/mL for CG and 1076 pg/mL for CC. Lower thresholds (388.4 pg/mL for CG and 431.5 pg/mL for CC) improved sensitivity (≥76.9%) and negative predictive value (>91%).

Conclusions

Calcium stimulation testing improves MTC detection in patients with moderate bCt elevation. Although CG showed marginally better diagnostic performance, CC remains a practical and reliable alternative, especially when higher cut-off values are considered. Early surgical intervention should be considered when sensitivity-driven thresholds are met.