Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) · 2015
Open carpal tunnel decompression by specialist versus nurse practitioner.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patel Nimesh, Roberton Andy, Batten Timothy, Millyard Cathy, Birdsall Paul
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the outcome after open carpal tunnel decompression by specialists versus a nurse practitioner.
METHODS: Of 1361 cases of open carpel tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia from 1996 to 2008, 807 were performed by specialists (consultant, specialist registrar, or specialty and associate specialist) and 554 by a nurse practitioner (since May 2006). The 2 groups were compared in terms of surgical time, total theatre time, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction with the service.
RESULTS: The mean surgical time was shorter in cases performed by specialists (13 vs. 18 minutes, p<0.0001), as was the mean total theatre time (26 vs. 29 minutes, p=0.0154). The rate of postoperative pain was higher in cases performed by specialists (31.5% vs. 24.5%, p=0.0125), as was the rate of patient dissatisfaction (1.6% vs. 0.18%, 0.0113). Nonetheless, since May 2006, outcome was comparable for specialists and the nurse practitioner. This could be due to the change from short-acting to long-acting/mixed local anaesthetic, and the technique for infiltration. The waiting time for surgery reduced from a mean of 16 to 3 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Specialists and the nurse practitioner achieved comparable outcome after open carpal tunnel decompression.
METHODS: Of 1361 cases of open carpel tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia from 1996 to 2008, 807 were performed by specialists (consultant, specialist registrar, or specialty and associate specialist) and 554 by a nurse practitioner (since May 2006). The 2 groups were compared in terms of surgical time, total theatre time, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction with the service.
RESULTS: The mean surgical time was shorter in cases performed by specialists (13 vs. 18 minutes, p<0.0001), as was the mean total theatre time (26 vs. 29 minutes, p=0.0154). The rate of postoperative pain was higher in cases performed by specialists (31.5% vs. 24.5%, p=0.0125), as was the rate of patient dissatisfaction (1.6% vs. 0.18%, 0.0113). Nonetheless, since May 2006, outcome was comparable for specialists and the nurse practitioner. This could be due to the change from short-acting to long-acting/mixed local anaesthetic, and the technique for infiltration. The waiting time for surgery reduced from a mean of 16 to 3 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Specialists and the nurse practitioner achieved comparable outcome after open carpal tunnel decompression.