MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1116_24

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024

Investigations of the Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Different Disinfection Protocols Against Endodontic Pathogens in Root Canal Systems.

Chohan Hitesh, Khullar Sanjana, Patel Ria H, Rath Jyotirmayee, Mohammed Sameera, Subramani Savadamoorthi Kamatchi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er: YAG) laser, ozone therapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and sodium hypochlorite against endodontic pathogens.

METHODS

Standardized root canal models inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans were treated with Er: YAG laser, 5.25% NaOCl, ozone, or PDT with methylene blue. Microbial loads, treatment time, and depth of penetration were assessed.

RESULTS

Er: YAG laser demonstrated the highest efficacy against Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, followed by PDT. Effects on Candida albicans were not statistically significant across treatments. Er: YAG achieved the greatest depth of penetration, while PDT required the longest application time.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser and photodynamic therapies show promise as alternatives to traditional chemical disinfection in endodontics, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize these protocols for clinical use.

Для цитирования: Chohan Hitesh, Khullar Sanjana, Patel Ria H, Rath Jyotirmayee, Mohammed Sameera, Subramani Savadamoorthi Kamatchi. Investigations of the Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Different Disinfection Protocols Against Endodontic Pathogens in Root Canal Systems.. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2024. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1116_24.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.