The Journal of surgical research · 2016
Prophylactic versus symptomatic Ladd procedures for pediatric malrotation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Covey Sarah E, Putnam Luke R, Anderson Kathryn T, Tsao KuoJen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intestinal malrotation can lead to volvulus resulting in necrosis, sepsis, and death. For symptomatic patients, treatment includes the Ladd procedure. However, debate remains regarding the timing and need for intervention for asymptomatic infants. We evaluated our experience with Ladd procedures including a clinical practice of prophylactic surgery for asymptomatic patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing the Ladd procedure was performed. Prophylactic Ladd procedures were identified as those occurring before any malrotation-related symptoms. Results were analyzed with student t test, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-squared tests.
RESULTS: From 2011-2014, 42 patients (prophylactic = 19, symptomatic = 23) underwent the Ladd procedure. The median age (IQR, interquartile range) of patients was 9.6 (3.9-18) mo and 18 (2.4-52) mo for prophylactic and symptomatic patients, respectively (P = 0.38). In patients who underwent symptomatic Ladd procedures, nine (39%) had volvulus and one (4.3%) had bowel necrosis at time of surgery. No prophylactic Ladd procedure patients required reoperation, whereas six (26%) symptomatic patients required malrotation-related reoperations (P = 0.02). Median (IQR) days to full enteral feeds were 5.0 d (3.3-6.8) versus 7.4 (5.0-11; P = 0.11), whereas median days to discharge were 8.0 d (6.1-11) versus 11 d (7.5-32) until discharge (P = 0.09) for prophylactic and symptomatic patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although symptomatic patients represent sicker children, the postoperative complications appear to be higher. For infants with known malrotation, prophylactic operations may be beneficial and should be considered. A larger, prospective study to demonstrate effectiveness and generalizability for prophylactic Ladd procedure is warranted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing the Ladd procedure was performed. Prophylactic Ladd procedures were identified as those occurring before any malrotation-related symptoms. Results were analyzed with student t test, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-squared tests.
RESULTS: From 2011-2014, 42 patients (prophylactic = 19, symptomatic = 23) underwent the Ladd procedure. The median age (IQR, interquartile range) of patients was 9.6 (3.9-18) mo and 18 (2.4-52) mo for prophylactic and symptomatic patients, respectively (P = 0.38). In patients who underwent symptomatic Ladd procedures, nine (39%) had volvulus and one (4.3%) had bowel necrosis at time of surgery. No prophylactic Ladd procedure patients required reoperation, whereas six (26%) symptomatic patients required malrotation-related reoperations (P = 0.02). Median (IQR) days to full enteral feeds were 5.0 d (3.3-6.8) versus 7.4 (5.0-11; P = 0.11), whereas median days to discharge were 8.0 d (6.1-11) versus 11 d (7.5-32) until discharge (P = 0.09) for prophylactic and symptomatic patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although symptomatic patients represent sicker children, the postoperative complications appear to be higher. For infants with known malrotation, prophylactic operations may be beneficial and should be considered. A larger, prospective study to demonstrate effectiveness and generalizability for prophylactic Ladd procedure is warranted.