MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1120672120964691

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of ophthalmology · 2020

Superficial keratectomy followed by intense pulsed light for Salzmann's nodular degeneration and coexisting meibomian gland dysfunction.

Monaco Gaspare, Casalino Giuseppe

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical course of a case of bilateral Salzmann nodular degeneration (SND) treated with superficial keratectomy (SK) followed by intense pulsed light (IPL) for the treatment of coexisting meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 54-year-old man who presented to us complaining of progressive blurred vision associated with foreign body sensation in both eyes because of SND and coexisting MGD. In view of symptoms and visual acuity (VA) deterioration, bilateral SK was performed. Two months after SK, IPL treatment to the face and meibomian gland expression (MGX) using the E-eye device (E-SWIN, Paris) on days 0, 15, and 45, were performed in both eyes with the aim to avoid recurrence and/or progression of MGD. One year after SK, the patient was asymptomatic and VA was 20/20 in both eyes; however because of worsening of non-invasive tear film break-up time measured on Sirius® Scheimpflug tomograph, IPL and MGX were promptly repeated and scheduled every 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In our case, IPL was a safe and effective option to control MGD in a patient with SND requiring SK with no observed recurrence of SND 2 years after surgery.

Для цитирования: Monaco Gaspare, Casalino Giuseppe. Superficial keratectomy followed by intense pulsed light for Salzmann's nodular degeneration and coexisting meibomian gland dysfunction.. European journal of ophthalmology. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1120672120964691.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.