MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/152660280200900612

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2002

In vitro comparison of four cerebral protection filters for preventing human plaque embolization during carotid interventions.

Müller-Hülsbeck Stefan, Jahnke Thomas, Liess Carsten, Glass Christoph, Paulsen Friedrich, Grimm Jan, Heller Martin

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate in an in vitro bench-top model the efficacy of 4 filtration devices designed for cerebral protection during carotid angioplasty.

METHODS

Embolization during carotid angioplasty was simulated with human plaque material (8 to 12 particles weighing 6.02 +/- 0.10 mg) in an open flow model with the aortic arch and carotid bifurcation made from elastic silicone tubes and saline used as the fluid medium. The 500 to 1500-microm particles were injected into the internal carotid artery (ICA) in front of the test protection device, which was deployed 5 cm distal to the bifurcation. Particles getting past the protection device or flowing into the external carotid artery (ECA) were caught in 100-microm filters and weighed. Ten trials were made on each of 4 devices: Angioguard, FilterWire EX, TRAP, and NeuroShield. All were deployed according to the manufacturers' directions except the FilterWire, which was manually repositioned in all tests to eliminate a gap between the filter and the tube wall.

RESULTS

The lowest weight of missed particles in the effluent was obtained with the NeuroShield (0.05 +/- 0.04 mg, 0.8% of injected particle weight) and FilterWire (0.08 +/- 0.05 mg, 1.3%; p=0.254 compared to NeuroShield, p=0.006 versus TRAP). The weight of particles missed by the TRAP device (0.16 +/- 0.06 mg, 2.6%; p<0.001 versus NeuroShield and Angioguard, p<0.05 compared to FilterWire) was higher, and the largest amount of missed particles was observed with the Angioguard filter (0.27 +/- 0.06 mg, 4.4%; p<0.001 compared to all). NeuroShield and FilterWire were significantly different (p<0.001) compared to Angioguard and TRAP in a pairwise analysis. No embolization into the ECA occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro, none of the tested devices had the ability to completely prevent embolization into the ICA. Comparing current designs, the NeuroShield filter and the FilterWire EX captured the highest percentage of human particles in this in vitro model, probably due to their larger filter volume.

Для цитирования: Müller-Hülsbeck Stefan, Jahnke Thomas, Liess Carsten, Glass Christoph, Paulsen Friedrich, Grimm Jan, Heller Martin. In vitro comparison of four cerebral protection filters for preventing human plaque embolization during carotid interventions.. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2002. DOI: 10.1177/152660280200900612.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.