MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3928/23258160-20190806-05

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2019

Indications and Outcomes for the Removal of Intraocular Lens Implants in a Retinal Surgery Practice.

Patel Nimesh A, Gangasani Nikitha, Yannuzzi Nicolas A, Melo Gustavo, Flynn Harry W, Smiddy William E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

To describe the reasons for and clinical outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) removal, with or without exchange, in the setting of retina surgery.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This is a retrospective, noncomparative, consecutive, interventional case series of patients undergoing IOL removal at an academic referral center performed by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2013. Data collected included baseline patient characteristics, visual acuity (VA), type of IOL, reason for IOL removal, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 63 eyes with IOL removal. Of these, 51 (81%) were left aphakic. For cases of IOL opacification or dislocated IOL (56), the decision to remove was made for 35 (63%) during concurrent retinal surgery due to obstruction in visualization. Overall, the most common reason for removal of the IOL was IOL opacities in 42 eyes (67%), followed by nonspecific nature of opacities (n = 19; 45%), oil artifact (n = 17; 40%), opaque nonvascular membranes (n = 4; 10%), and fibrovascular proliferation (n = 2; 5%). Other causes for removal were IOL dislocation (n = 14; 22%), endophthalmitis (n = 7; 11%), and broken IOL haptic (n = 1; 2%). The composition of the 42 IOLs with opacification included 19 (45%) silicone, 14 (33%) unspecified, five (12%) polymethyl methacrylate, and four acrylic (10%). From the 17 IOLs removed due to oil opacification, 15 (83%) were silicone, and two (17%) were unspecified. Postoperative complications included recurrent retinal detachment (n = 13; 21%), hypotony (n = 8; 13%), phthisis bulbi (n = 8; 13%), corneal edema (n = 7; 11%), cystoid macular edema (n = 5; 8%), elevated intraocular pressure (n = 3; 5%), vitreous hemorrhage (n = 3; 5%), hyphema (1; 2%), anterior synechiae (1; 2%), and subretinal hemorrhage (1; 2%) The mean (SD) immediate, 3 months, and final best-corrected VA in logMAR were 2.18 (0.47), 1.85 (0.82), and 1.97 (0.85).

CONCLUSION

The vitreoretinal surgeon must be prepared for IOL removal, especially if IOL opacification and dislocation compromise the view or capability to achieve primary retinal reattachment objectives. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:504-508.].

Для цитирования: Patel Nimesh A, Gangasani Nikitha, Yannuzzi Nicolas A, Melo Gustavo, Flynn Harry W, Smiddy William E. Indications and Outcomes for the Removal of Intraocular Lens Implants in a Retinal Surgery Practice.. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2019. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20190806-05.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.