MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.023

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of anaesthesia · 2023

Long-term survival in older patients given propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for major cancer surgery: follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.

Cao Shuang-Jie, Zhang Yue, Zhang Yu-Xiu, Zhao Wei, Pan Ling-Hui, Sun Xu-De, Jia Zhen, Ouyang Wen, Ye Qing-Shan, Zhang Fang-Xiang, Guo Yong-Qing, Ai Yan-Qiu, Zhao Bin-Jiang, Yu Jian-Bo, Liu Zhi-Heng, Yin Ning, Li Xue-Ying, Ma Jia-Hui, Li Hui-Juan, Wang Mei-Rong, Sessler Daniel I, Ma Daqing, Wang Dong-Xin, First Study of Perioperative Organ Protection (SPOP1) investigators

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Experimental evidence indicates that i.v. anaesthesia might reduce cancer recurrence compared with volatile anaesthesia, but clinical information is observational only. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that propofol-based anaesthesia improves survival over 3 or more years after potentially curative major cancer surgery.

METHODS

This was a long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial in 14 tertiary hospitals in China. We enrolled 1228 patients aged 65-90 yr who were scheduled for major cancer surgery. They were randomised to either propofol-based i.v. anaesthesia or to sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was overall survival after surgery. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free and event-free survival.

RESULTS

Amongst subjects randomised, 1195 (mean age 72 yr; 773 [65%] male) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. At the end of follow-up (median 43 months), there were 188 deaths amongst 598 patients (31%) assigned to propofol-based anaesthesia compared with 175 deaths amongst 597 patients (29%) assigned to sevoflurane-based anaesthesia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.26; P=0.834. Recurrence-free survival was 223/598 (37%) in patients given propofol anaesthesia vs 206/597 (35%) given sevoflurane anaesthesia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI: 0.89-1.30; P=0.465. Event-free survival was 294/598 (49%) in patients given propofol anaesthesia vs 274/597 (46%) given sevoflurane anaesthesia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.29; P=0.298.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival after major cancer surgery was similar with i.v. and volatile anaesthesia. Propofol-based iv. anaesthesia should not be used for cancer surgery with the expectation that it will improve overall or cancer-specific survival.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ChiCTR-IPR-15006209; NCT02660411.

Для цитирования: Cao Shuang-Jie, Zhang Yue, Zhang Yu-Xiu, Zhao Wei, Pan Ling-Hui, Sun Xu-De, Jia Zhen, Ouyang Wen, Ye Qing-Shan, Zhang Fang-Xiang, Guo Yong-Qing, Ai Yan-Qiu, Zhao Bin-Jiang, Yu Jian-Bo, Liu Zhi-Heng, Yin Ning, Li Xue-Ying, Ma Jia-Hui, Li Hui-Juan, Wang Mei-Rong, Sessler Daniel I, Ma Daqing, Wang Dong-Xin, First Study of Perioperative Organ Protection (SPOP1) investigators. Long-term survival in older patients given propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for major cancer surgery: follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.. British journal of anaesthesia. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.