Minerva stomatologica · 2017
Adjunctive use of an ethyl lauroyl arginate-(LAE-)-containing mouthwash in the nonsurgical therapy of periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pilloni Andrea, Carere Mauro, Orrù Germano, Scano Alessandra, Trezza Cinzia, Rojas Mariana A, Zeza Blerina
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the clinical and microbiological effects of 0.147% ethyl lauroyl arginate (LAE)-containing mouthwash compared to 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash in the treatment of periodontitis.
METHODS: Subjects were randomized to use 0.147% LAE and 0.12% CHX mouthwash after professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) twice daily 1 hour after brushing for 4 weeks. Periodontal pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (FMBS) and dental plaque (FMPS) were measured at baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months. Microbiological samples were taken at baseline, at 4 weeks and 3 months after plaque recording and prior to PPD and BoP measurements.
RESULTS: Forty subjects were randomized to treatment. Both therapies resulted in reduced FMPS, FMBS and residual pockets at 4 weeks and 3 months. The differences were not statistically significant. There were no treatment-related adverse events. Total bacterial count and the specific pathogens were reduced at 4 weeks and 3 months by both mouthwashes with no statistical differences between them at neither period of time.
CONCLUSIONS: A mouthwash containing 0.147% LAE could be an alternative to the use of 0.12% CHX in the non-surgical therapy of periodontitis considering the similar clinical effects, more stable microbiological improvement and absence of adverse effects.
METHODS: Subjects were randomized to use 0.147% LAE and 0.12% CHX mouthwash after professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) twice daily 1 hour after brushing for 4 weeks. Periodontal pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (FMBS) and dental plaque (FMPS) were measured at baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months. Microbiological samples were taken at baseline, at 4 weeks and 3 months after plaque recording and prior to PPD and BoP measurements.
RESULTS: Forty subjects were randomized to treatment. Both therapies resulted in reduced FMPS, FMBS and residual pockets at 4 weeks and 3 months. The differences were not statistically significant. There were no treatment-related adverse events. Total bacterial count and the specific pathogens were reduced at 4 weeks and 3 months by both mouthwashes with no statistical differences between them at neither period of time.
CONCLUSIONS: A mouthwash containing 0.147% LAE could be an alternative to the use of 0.12% CHX in the non-surgical therapy of periodontitis considering the similar clinical effects, more stable microbiological improvement and absence of adverse effects.