Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2024
Can the second phase of contrast-enhanced MRA of the neck provide additional information in the acute stroke setting?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shah P, Kale H, Shrivastava M, Sanghvi D, Munshi M, Sangani G, Mundada K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Double-concentration magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are frequently used in contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) of the head and neck. To avoid mistiming the peak concentration of intraluminal contrast (due to shorter duration of peak), a second acquisition is sometimes performed.
PURPOSE: To evaluate additional information from the second acquisition of CE-MRA and compare the collateral scoring to the hypoperfusion index obtained on MR perfusion, and to investigate presence of pseudo-occlusion using the second phase of CE-MRA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. CE-MRA of the brain/neck, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion scan (in majority) and subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were evaluated in patients with previous acute internal carotid artery (ICA)/middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Evaluation of CE-MRA/MR perfusion and DSA was performed by three experienced neuroradiologists and one neurointerventionist, respectively.
RESULTS: The site of ICA occlusion was seen to be distal to the site noted on early arterial phase (pseudo-occlusion of ICA) in 28.5% of patients. A significant negative correlation was seen between a higher HIR and collateral score.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of second phase CE-MRA can provide valuable information that may be otherwise lost if only the early arterial phase is evaluated.
PURPOSE: To evaluate additional information from the second acquisition of CE-MRA and compare the collateral scoring to the hypoperfusion index obtained on MR perfusion, and to investigate presence of pseudo-occlusion using the second phase of CE-MRA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. CE-MRA of the brain/neck, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion scan (in majority) and subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were evaluated in patients with previous acute internal carotid artery (ICA)/middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Evaluation of CE-MRA/MR perfusion and DSA was performed by three experienced neuroradiologists and one neurointerventionist, respectively.
RESULTS: The site of ICA occlusion was seen to be distal to the site noted on early arterial phase (pseudo-occlusion of ICA) in 28.5% of patients. A significant negative correlation was seen between a higher HIR and collateral score.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of second phase CE-MRA can provide valuable information that may be otherwise lost if only the early arterial phase is evaluated.