The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2005
Rates of antifungal resistance among Spanish clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Perkins Alexander, Gomez-Lopez Alicia, Mellado Emilia, Rodriguez-Tudela Juan L, Cuenca-Estrella Manuel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Activities in vitro of six antifungal agents were tested against a collection of 317 Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans clinical isolates.
METHODS: The procedure described in document 7.1 by the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing with minor modifications was employed.
RESULTS: Amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole and ravuconazole exhibited a potent activity with geometric mean (GM) MICs under 0.26 mg/L. The GM MIC of flucytosine was 7.33 mg/L and that of fluconazole was 4.16 mg/L. The rates of antifungal resistance were 5.3% for amphotericin B, 0.9% for voriconazole and 3.1% for ravuconazole. Fifteen point eight per cent of strains had itraconazole MICs > or = 1 mg/L, and 46% of strains had flucytosine MICs > or = 8 mg/L. Fluconazole susceptibility (MIC < or = 8 mg/L) stood at 53.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of fluconazole susceptibility was significantly lower than that in other surveys. Cross-resistance to itraconazole was common (33.8%) but almost the whole collection was susceptible to voriconazole and ravuconazole. These results should be confirmed with prospective and population-based surveillance programmes.
METHODS: The procedure described in document 7.1 by the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing with minor modifications was employed.
RESULTS: Amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole and ravuconazole exhibited a potent activity with geometric mean (GM) MICs under 0.26 mg/L. The GM MIC of flucytosine was 7.33 mg/L and that of fluconazole was 4.16 mg/L. The rates of antifungal resistance were 5.3% for amphotericin B, 0.9% for voriconazole and 3.1% for ravuconazole. Fifteen point eight per cent of strains had itraconazole MICs > or = 1 mg/L, and 46% of strains had flucytosine MICs > or = 8 mg/L. Fluconazole susceptibility (MIC < or = 8 mg/L) stood at 53.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of fluconazole susceptibility was significantly lower than that in other surveys. Cross-resistance to itraconazole was common (33.8%) but almost the whole collection was susceptible to voriconazole and ravuconazole. These results should be confirmed with prospective and population-based surveillance programmes.