MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e31824cd718

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2012

Giant malignant meningioma invading the calvarial bone and scalp.

Li Zheng-yong, Cen Ying, Gu Mingjing, Wei Yating

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Meningiomas are common and mostly benign intracranial tumors, but malignant meningioma is a rare subtype with high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Also, most meningiomas grow intracranially, and extracranial growth of meningiomas has rarely been reported. We present here a rare case of a giant malignant meningioma with multiple recurrences. The patient was a 73-year-old woman who was evaluated to have a malignant meningioma of the frontal part of the skull 3 years before being admitted to our hospital and received surgical treatment. The tumor recurred 3 years after the first surgery and was classified as a giant meningioma on admission to our hospital. We performed total resection of the giant meningioma and reconstructed the defect with artificial dura, skull, and a local rotating flap. The patient recovered and lived well for 1 year. However, 15 months after surgery, the patient died of the recurrent tumor after refusing any treatment. Meningiomas are usually common and benign intracranial tumors; however, the anaplastic subtype of meningiomas is rare and malignant. Despite the high rates of recurrence and metastasis, surgery is still an option. For giant invasive tumors, the cooperation of neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons is essential.

Для цитирования: Li Zheng-yong, Cen Ying, Gu Mingjing, Wei Yating. Giant malignant meningioma invading the calvarial bone and scalp.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31824cd718.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.