Asian journal of surgery · 2023
Nephroscope-assisted single trocar peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion improves catheter survival compared with laparoscopic technique: Ten-year experience of a single-center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Han-Chung, Hsieh Hsiang-Chen, Liao Po-Chi, Chang Li-Wen, Hu Ju-Chuan, Hung Sheng-Chun, Lin Chia-Yen, Wang Shu-Chi, Chen Cheng-Che, Yang Cheng-Kuang, Wang Shian-Shiang, Chen Chuan-Shu, Lu Kevin, Li Jian-Ri, Cheng Chen-Li, Chiu Kun-Yuan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An ideal technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion should provide a long-term functioning catheter until permanent renal replacement therapy becomes available. We developed a technique using the nephroscope-assisted single-trocar approach in 2011. In this study, we report the outcomes, learning curve analysis and cost-effectiveness analysisof the nephroscopic approach compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach.
METHOD: Between January 2005 and December 2020, we retrospectively reviewed 511 patients who received PD catheter insertions using the laparoscopic or nephroscopic approach. We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients, surgical outcomes, and complications of the two groups. We further analyzed the nephroscopic group to determine the cost-effectiveness analysis, learning curve and the complication frequency between the learning and mastery periods of the nephroscopic approach.
RESULTS: A total of 208 patients underwent laparoscopic PD catheter insertion, whereas 303 patients received nephroscopic surgery. The median catheter survival in the nephroscopic group is significantly longer (43.1 vs. 60.5 months, p = 0.019). The incidence of peritonitis (29.3% vs.20.8%, p = 0.035) and exit site infection (12.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.019) were significantly lower in the nephroscopic group. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed a medical expense reduction of 16000 USD annually by using the nephroscopic technique. There was no difference in the frequency of surgical complications between the learning and mastery phases when examining the learning curve analysis for the nephroscopic technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach, the nephroscopic technique effectively prolonged catheter survival and reduces health care cost by reducing infectious complications. The low complication rate during the learning phase of surgery makes the procedure safe for patients and surgeons.
METHOD: Between January 2005 and December 2020, we retrospectively reviewed 511 patients who received PD catheter insertions using the laparoscopic or nephroscopic approach. We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients, surgical outcomes, and complications of the two groups. We further analyzed the nephroscopic group to determine the cost-effectiveness analysis, learning curve and the complication frequency between the learning and mastery periods of the nephroscopic approach.
RESULTS: A total of 208 patients underwent laparoscopic PD catheter insertion, whereas 303 patients received nephroscopic surgery. The median catheter survival in the nephroscopic group is significantly longer (43.1 vs. 60.5 months, p = 0.019). The incidence of peritonitis (29.3% vs.20.8%, p = 0.035) and exit site infection (12.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.019) were significantly lower in the nephroscopic group. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed a medical expense reduction of 16000 USD annually by using the nephroscopic technique. There was no difference in the frequency of surgical complications between the learning and mastery phases when examining the learning curve analysis for the nephroscopic technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach, the nephroscopic technique effectively prolonged catheter survival and reduces health care cost by reducing infectious complications. The low complication rate during the learning phase of surgery makes the procedure safe for patients and surgeons.