Journal of affective disorders · 2004
Sensitivity to cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide in major depression.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koszycki Diana, Copen John, Bradwejn Jacques
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to the panicogenic effects of cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) is enhanced in panic disorder patients relative to normal controls (NC). In the present study, we determined whether sensitivity to CCK-4 is enhanced in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with no history of panic attacks. We also determined whether CCK-4 would exacerbate depressive symptoms.
METHODS: The study used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Behavioral and cardiovascular response to a submaximal dose (20 microg) of CCK-4 was studied in seven patients with MDD and 12 NC subjects.
RESULTS: None of the subjects panicked with placebo, whereas 29% of MDD and 17% of NC subjects panicked with CCK-4. There was no significant difference between groups on the frequency of CCK-4-induced panic or the number and intensity of panic symptoms. No significant difference was detected for cardiovascular response to the CCK-4 challenge. CCK-4 did not worsen depressive symptoms in MDD patients.
LIMITATIONS: Small number of study subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that MDD patients show a response to CCK-4 that is comparable to NC. The lack of effect of CCK-4 on depressive symptoms suggest that central CCK receptors may not play an important role in the pathophysiology of MDD.
METHODS: The study used a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Behavioral and cardiovascular response to a submaximal dose (20 microg) of CCK-4 was studied in seven patients with MDD and 12 NC subjects.
RESULTS: None of the subjects panicked with placebo, whereas 29% of MDD and 17% of NC subjects panicked with CCK-4. There was no significant difference between groups on the frequency of CCK-4-induced panic or the number and intensity of panic symptoms. No significant difference was detected for cardiovascular response to the CCK-4 challenge. CCK-4 did not worsen depressive symptoms in MDD patients.
LIMITATIONS: Small number of study subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that MDD patients show a response to CCK-4 that is comparable to NC. The lack of effect of CCK-4 on depressive symptoms suggest that central CCK receptors may not play an important role in the pathophysiology of MDD.