Journal of hypertension · 1999
Detection of hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by computer-assisted P wave analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dilaveris P E, Gialafos E J, Chrissos D, Andrikopoulos G K, Richter D J, Lazaki E, Gialafos J E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To determine whether hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) could be detected while in sinus rhythm, a computer-based 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was recorded in 50 hypertensive patients with history of paroxysmal AF (group A) and in 60 hypertensive patients without history of AF (group B). The maximum P-wave duration (P(maximum)), the minimum P-wave duration (P(minimum)), P-wave dispersion (Pdispersion = Pmaximum Pminimum), adjusted P-wave dispersion (APdispersion = Pdispersion/square root of the number of measurable leads), mean P-wave duration (mean P) and the standard deviation of the P-wave duration in all measured leads (SDP) were calculated.
RESULTS: Pdispersion, APdispersion and SDP were significantly higher in group A than in group B (Pdispersion, 52 +/- 19 versus 41 +/- 15 ms, P< 0.001; APdispersion, 15.2 +/- 5.5 versus 11.9 +/- 4.6 ms, P< 0.001; SDP, 16 +/- 5 versus 13 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.001). P(minimum), mean P and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly lower in group A than in group B (Pminimum, 79 +/- 18 versus 91 +/- 13 ms, P < 0.001; mean P, 108 +/- 18 versus 116 +/- 13 ms, P= 0.005; LVEF, 64 +/- 5 versus 69 +/- 8%, P< 0.001). Pminimum, Pdispersion, mean P, SDP, APdispersion and LVEF were found to be significant univariate predictors of paroxysmal AF, whereas only Pminimum (P< 0.001) remained a significant independent predictor of paroxysmal AF in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal AF could be detected while in sinus rhythm by computer-assisted electrocardiographic P-wave analysis.
RESULTS: Pdispersion, APdispersion and SDP were significantly higher in group A than in group B (Pdispersion, 52 +/- 19 versus 41 +/- 15 ms, P< 0.001; APdispersion, 15.2 +/- 5.5 versus 11.9 +/- 4.6 ms, P< 0.001; SDP, 16 +/- 5 versus 13 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.001). P(minimum), mean P and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly lower in group A than in group B (Pminimum, 79 +/- 18 versus 91 +/- 13 ms, P < 0.001; mean P, 108 +/- 18 versus 116 +/- 13 ms, P= 0.005; LVEF, 64 +/- 5 versus 69 +/- 8%, P< 0.001). Pminimum, Pdispersion, mean P, SDP, APdispersion and LVEF were found to be significant univariate predictors of paroxysmal AF, whereas only Pminimum (P< 0.001) remained a significant independent predictor of paroxysmal AF in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Hypertensive patients at risk for paroxysmal AF could be detected while in sinus rhythm by computer-assisted electrocardiographic P-wave analysis.