Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the extracranial cerebral vessels: a direct comparison between intravenous and intra-arterial DSA.

Fifty patients being investigated for ischaemic cerebrovascular disease underwent both intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) and intra-arterial arch digital subtraction angiography (arch-DSA) to enable a direct comparison to be made between the two techniques. The overall quality of the images obtained by arch-DSA was better than that obtained by IV-DSA, but there was no significant difference between the number and gradation of stenoses detected by the two techniques. No significant stenosis was missed by IV-DSA and the technique was found to be sufficiently accurate for it to be used as a screening procedure for carotid bifurcation stenoses suitable for carotid endarterectomy. The advantages and limitations of both techniques are discussed.