MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-118-1-199301010-00008

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of internal medicine · 1993

Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.

Cass O W, Freeman M L, Peine C J, Zera R T, Onstad G R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the number of supervised gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures required to achieve initial competency using a simple objective grading system.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A gastroenterology and surgical training program at a large, university-affiliated county hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven gastroenterology fellows and five fourth-year surgery residents.

INTERVENTIONS: Trainees were graded postprocedure using a microcomputer program. Grading criteria for esophagogastroduodenoscopy included entering the esophagus (esophageal intubation), traversing the pylorus into the duodenum, and recognizing whether the upper gastrointestinal tract was abnormal. Criteria for colonoscopy were traversing the splenic flexure, intubating the cecum, and recognizing whether the colon was abnormal.

RESULTS

When presented with a case mix representative of practice, esophageal intubation did not reach 90% until more than 100 procedures had been done. Cecal intubation remained at only 84% after 100 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 100 supervised upper gastrointestinal endoscopies or colonoscopies are necessary to achieve technical competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Для цитирования: Cass O W, Freeman M L, Peine C J, Zera R T, Onstad G R. Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.. Annals of internal medicine. 1993. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-1-199301010-00008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.