MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800790730

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of surgery · 1992

Flush aortic tie versus selective preservation of the ascending left colic artery in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Corder A P, Karanjia N D, Williams J D, Heald R J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The effects of two methods of colonic vascular ligation were studied in 143 consecutive patients who underwent low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and full mobilization of the splenic flexure. Either the ascending left colic artery (ALCA) was selectively preserved (n = 52) or a flush aortic ligation was performed (n = 91). In those with a protective colostomy, the radiological leak rate was 12 per cent when the ALCA was preserved (n = 41) and 10 per cent when a flush aortic tie was performed (n = 60) (P greater than 0.95; 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) for difference -10 to +15 per cent). In those without a colostomy, the clinical leak rates of 9 per cent when the ALCA was preserved (n = 11) and 19 per cent when a flush aortic tie was performed (n = 31) were not significantly different (P greater than 0.10; 95 per cent c.i. for difference -12 to +32 per cent). Proportional hazards analysis showed no association between the method of vascular ligation and the risk of tumour recurrence and death. Anastomotic leak rates, tumour recurrence and survival were not related to the method of vascular ligation.

Для цитирования: Corder A P, Karanjia N D, Williams J D, Heald R J. Flush aortic tie versus selective preservation of the ascending left colic artery in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.. The British journal of surgery. 1992. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790730.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.