Translational stroke research · 2022
Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase IIa Randomized Clinical Trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Haiqing, Wang Yuan, Ma Qingfeng, Chen Huisheng, Liu Bo, Yang Yi, Zhu Jianguo, Zhao Shigang, Jin Xiaoping, Li Yongqiu, Wang Yanyong, Zhu Runxiu, Zhao Liandong, Liu Junyan, Ma Qilin, Lin Yongzhong, Tian Xiangyang, Zhang Qing, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Yongbo, Zhou Jie, Li Yansong, Song Zhi, Feng Wuwei, Liu Rui, Ji Xunming, Wang Yuping
Аннотация
Recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) is a novel thrombolytic that has been approved to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, the safety and efficacy of intravenous rhPro-UK in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has not been well established. We aimed to investigate the safety and preliminary efficacy of rhPro-UK in patients with AIS in a multi-center phase IIa trial setting. One hundred nineteen patients within 4.5 h of AIS onset were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, 23-center phase IIa clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 35 mg (n = 40) or 50 mg (n = 39) intravenous rhPro-UK or 0.9 mg/kg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA; n = 40). The primary endpoint was functional independence defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. The secondary outcome was early neurological improvement defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 24 h after drug administration. Safety endpoints included death due to any cause, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and other serious adverse events (SAEs). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of ≤ 1 at 90 days did not differ significantly among three groups (35 mg rhPro-UK: 55.56% vs. 50 mg rhPro-UK: 57.89% vs. vs. r-tPA: 52.63%; P = 0.92). The rates of treatment response, referring to early neurological improvement, were similar among these three groups (36.11% vs. 31.58% vs. 28.95%, respectively; P = 0.85). There was no difference in mortality at 90 days or in the rate of other SAEs among the three groups. One patient in the 50 mg rhPro-UK group suffered sICH. While neither the primary efficacy outcomes nor safety profile differed significantly among the low, high rhPro-UK and control groups, it is a logical step to further test the low-dose rhPro-UK group versus the control group in a well-powered phase III study.Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn . Identifier: ChiCTR1800016519. Date of registration: June 6 2018.