MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.06.013

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2008

Crossed cheiro-oral syndrome.

Chen Wei-Hsi, Li Tzu-Hui, Chen Tsung-Hwa, Lin Hung-Sheng, Hsu Ming-Ching, Chen Shun-Sheng, Liu Jia-Shou

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Cheiro-oral syndrome is characterized by sensory impairment confined to perioral area and ipsilateral fingers/hand. It results from an involvement of the ascending sensory tracts above the pons. However, a crossed pattern of perioral and acral paresthesia was rarely reported before.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This study reports the neuroanatomic relationship, course and clinical significance of perioral and contralateral acral paresthesia in four patients. We term it the crossed cheiro-oral syndrome.

RESULTS

All patients had lateral or dorsolateral medullary infarctions that were ipsilateral to their perioral paresthesia. The contributory origin is considered a diagonal lesion involving the par oralis fibers within the descending trigeminal sensory tract and acral portion of the lateral spinothalamic tract at the lateral portion of medulla oblongata. Despite of a restricted sensory disturbance at initial, progressive neurological disability terminated to Wallenberg's syndrome ensued in three patients and disabling deficits persisted in two of them.

CONCLUSION

The crossed cheiro-oral syndrome seems a mild form of Wallenberg's syndrome. Therefore, it predicts medullary involvement and is also a warning sign for progression.

Для цитирования: Chen Wei-Hsi, Li Tzu-Hui, Chen Tsung-Hwa, Lin Hung-Sheng, Hsu Ming-Ching, Chen Shun-Sheng, Liu Jia-Shou. Crossed cheiro-oral syndrome.. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.06.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.