Brachytherapy · 2022
Feasibility of electronic brachytherapy in cervix cancer-A dosimetric comparison of different brachytherapy techniques.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lozares-Cordero Sergio, Gonzalez-Perez Victor, Pellejero-Pellejero Santiago, Rodriguez-Ruiz Lucia, Guinot-Rodriguez Jose Luis, Villafranca-Iturre Elena, Méndez-Villamón Agustina, Gandía-Martínez Almudena, Fuentemilla-Urío Naiara, Ruggeri Ricardo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes cases in which electronic brachytherapy (eBT) led to acceptable treatment plans in cervical cancer. Findings were compared with dosimetry values obtained in 192Ir-based treatments according to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and the disease stage.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with cervical cancer from two centers. The patients were treated with 192Ir based on MRI. It was possible to use interstitial needles via an Utrecht-type applicator. Dosimetry was simulated using eBT and the parameters D90 and D98 (HR-CTV) and D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc (bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon) were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison. The overall cohort of patients was analyzed, as were the sub-cohorts based on stage (FIGO stages I+IIA, IIB and III-IV). Finally, the dosimetry of the eBT plans was evaluated, and the plans obtained were classified as "good", "acceptable", or "poor".
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the eBT and 192Ir plans for D98 (HR-CTV), D1cc and D0.1cc (bladder), and D1cc and D0.1cc (sigmoid colon). A total of 31 cases (64.6%) were considered good, seven (14.6%) were considered acceptable, and 10 (20.8%) were considered poor. For volumes <30 cc, all the plans were good or acceptable; for volumes >30 cc, 54.3% were good, and 71.4% were good or acceptable. By stage, eBT plans for patients with stage IB-IIA disease were good in 100%, whereas those for patients with stage IIB were good in 70.6% and III-IV disease were good in 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: eBT provides appropriate dosimetry for treatment of cervical cancer in selected cases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with cervical cancer from two centers. The patients were treated with 192Ir based on MRI. It was possible to use interstitial needles via an Utrecht-type applicator. Dosimetry was simulated using eBT and the parameters D90 and D98 (HR-CTV) and D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc (bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon) were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison. The overall cohort of patients was analyzed, as were the sub-cohorts based on stage (FIGO stages I+IIA, IIB and III-IV). Finally, the dosimetry of the eBT plans was evaluated, and the plans obtained were classified as "good", "acceptable", or "poor".
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between the eBT and 192Ir plans for D98 (HR-CTV), D1cc and D0.1cc (bladder), and D1cc and D0.1cc (sigmoid colon). A total of 31 cases (64.6%) were considered good, seven (14.6%) were considered acceptable, and 10 (20.8%) were considered poor. For volumes <30 cc, all the plans were good or acceptable; for volumes >30 cc, 54.3% were good, and 71.4% were good or acceptable. By stage, eBT plans for patients with stage IB-IIA disease were good in 100%, whereas those for patients with stage IIB were good in 70.6% and III-IV disease were good in 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: eBT provides appropriate dosimetry for treatment of cervical cancer in selected cases.