International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024
One-year results of the Flowdynamics Dense Mesh Stent for residual dissection after proximal repair of stanford type A or type B aortic dissection: a multicenter, prospective, and randomized study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Chen, Duan Weixun, Li Zhen, Wang Chenhao, Yang Peng, Liu Yu, Zuo Jian, Hu Jia
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Negative remodeling of the distal aorta following proximal repair for acute aortic dissection has garnered growing attention. This clinical scenario has spurred the development of techniques and devices. A multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled study was conducted with the aim of confirming the safety and effectiveness of a newly-designed flowdynamics dense mesh stent for the treatment of residual dissection after proximal repair.
METHODS: Patients with nonchronic residual dissection affecting visceral branches were prospectively enrolled at three centers and randomly allocated to either the FDMS group or the control group. Primary endpoints encompassed all-cause and aortic-related mortality, while the patency of branch arteries is indeed a key focal metric. Morphological changes (diameter, area, and volume) were analyzed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect.
RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were recruited in the clinical trial, and 103 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. The rate of freedom from all-cause and aortic-related death in the FDMS group was 94.64 and 100%, respectively. All visceral branches remained patent. The FDMS group exhibited a substantial expansion in TL and a notable shrinkage in FL at the planes below renal arteries (ΔArea TL : FDMS vs. Control, 0.74±0.46 vs. 0.34±0.66 cm 2 , P <0.001; ΔArea FL : FDMS vs. Control, -0.72±1.26 vs. -0.12±0.86 cm, P =0.01) and 5 cm below renal arteries (ΔArea TL : FDMS vs. Control, 1.06±0.75 vs. 0.16±0.63 cm 2 , P <0.001; ΔArea FL : FDMS vs. Control, -0.53±1.43 vs. -0.25±1.00 cm, P =0.27). Meanwhile, the FDMS group demonstrated an increase of 22.55±11.14 cm 3 in TL ( P <0.001) and a corresponding reduction of 21.94±11.77 cm 3 in FL ( P =0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: This newly-designed FDMS for endovascular repair of residual dissection following the proximal repair is demonstrated to be safe and effective at 12 months.
METHODS: Patients with nonchronic residual dissection affecting visceral branches were prospectively enrolled at three centers and randomly allocated to either the FDMS group or the control group. Primary endpoints encompassed all-cause and aortic-related mortality, while the patency of branch arteries is indeed a key focal metric. Morphological changes (diameter, area, and volume) were analyzed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect.
RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were recruited in the clinical trial, and 103 patients completed the 12-month follow-up. The rate of freedom from all-cause and aortic-related death in the FDMS group was 94.64 and 100%, respectively. All visceral branches remained patent. The FDMS group exhibited a substantial expansion in TL and a notable shrinkage in FL at the planes below renal arteries (ΔArea TL : FDMS vs. Control, 0.74±0.46 vs. 0.34±0.66 cm 2 , P <0.001; ΔArea FL : FDMS vs. Control, -0.72±1.26 vs. -0.12±0.86 cm, P =0.01) and 5 cm below renal arteries (ΔArea TL : FDMS vs. Control, 1.06±0.75 vs. 0.16±0.63 cm 2 , P <0.001; ΔArea FL : FDMS vs. Control, -0.53±1.43 vs. -0.25±1.00 cm, P =0.27). Meanwhile, the FDMS group demonstrated an increase of 22.55±11.14 cm 3 in TL ( P <0.001) and a corresponding reduction of 21.94±11.77 cm 3 in FL ( P =0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: This newly-designed FDMS for endovascular repair of residual dissection following the proximal repair is demonstrated to be safe and effective at 12 months.