Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
Sensitivity and prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in stage I to III malignant melanoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bohne Ann-Sophie, Heber Marilena, Axt Franziska, von Bubnoff Nikolas, Kähler Katharina
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification to guide adjuvant treatment in early stages of melanoma becomes increasingly important. This study investigated circulating tumor (ct)DNA in early melanoma stages to predict disease progression in real-world settings in German melanoma patients.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, 61 patients with melanoma stages I-III with known disease-progression following primary diagnosis were included. Patients were requested to have baseline serum samples ≤ 4 weeks after diagnosis and ≥ 12 weeks preceding disease progression. In ctDNA isolated from 185 serum samples matching inclusion criteria, BRAF V600E/K, NRAS Q61K/L/R and TERT promoter mutations were quantified and correlated with serum levels of S100 and LDH.
RESULTS: Mutated ctDNA was detected in ≥ 1sample in 43 of 53 patients (81.13%). CtDNA was more sensitive in the prediction of melanoma relapse than established biomarker S100, LDH (p < 0.001) and both LDH/S100 (p < 0.001). Highest mean ctDNA was measured during shift of stage III to stage IV disease (24.25 cps/µL) and shift within stage III (12.42 cps/µL). The detection of ctDNA at any time point trended towards shorter overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the superiority of ctDNA harboring melanoma specific mutations over LDH and S100 in identifying patients at risk for recurrence in early melanoma stages in a single center cohort of melanoma patients. Future prospective trials are warranted to confirm this.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, 61 patients with melanoma stages I-III with known disease-progression following primary diagnosis were included. Patients were requested to have baseline serum samples ≤ 4 weeks after diagnosis and ≥ 12 weeks preceding disease progression. In ctDNA isolated from 185 serum samples matching inclusion criteria, BRAF V600E/K, NRAS Q61K/L/R and TERT promoter mutations were quantified and correlated with serum levels of S100 and LDH.
RESULTS: Mutated ctDNA was detected in ≥ 1sample in 43 of 53 patients (81.13%). CtDNA was more sensitive in the prediction of melanoma relapse than established biomarker S100, LDH (p < 0.001) and both LDH/S100 (p < 0.001). Highest mean ctDNA was measured during shift of stage III to stage IV disease (24.25 cps/µL) and shift within stage III (12.42 cps/µL). The detection of ctDNA at any time point trended towards shorter overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the superiority of ctDNA harboring melanoma specific mutations over LDH and S100 in identifying patients at risk for recurrence in early melanoma stages in a single center cohort of melanoma patients. Future prospective trials are warranted to confirm this.