Surgical neurology · 2000
Is decompressive craniectomy for acute cerebral infarction of any benefit?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koh M S, Goh K Y, Tung M Y, Chan C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute occlusion of the major cerebral arteries results in ischaemic changes to the brain, without time for reperfusion by the collateral circulation. The subsequent cellular events lead to a breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, causing malignant cerebral edema manifested clinically by a rapid neurological deterioration. The aim of this study was to determine the value of surgical decompression in patients who present with acute cerebral infarction.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with deteriorating consciousness level from massive cerebral ischemia and secondary edema, treated by decompressive craniectomy. RESULTSThere were 10 patients over a 2-year period from 1997-99, consisting of seven male and three female patients (mean age 47.56 years) with a mean preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6/15. Three patients had dominant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, four had nondominant MCA infarction, one had posterior cerebral artery infarction, and the remaining two had cerebellar infarction. At a mean follow-up period of 7 months, two patients had died (20% mortality), four patients (40%) were vegetative or severely disabled, and the remaining four patients (40%) had mild disability or good outcome. Favorable prognostic factors were younger age (less than 50 years) and good initial GCS score (14 or better).
CONCLUSION: Decompressive craniectomy in the setting of acute brain swelling from cerebral infarction is a life-saving procedure and should be considered in younger patients who have a rapidly deteriorating neurologic status.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with deteriorating consciousness level from massive cerebral ischemia and secondary edema, treated by decompressive craniectomy. RESULTSThere were 10 patients over a 2-year period from 1997-99, consisting of seven male and three female patients (mean age 47.56 years) with a mean preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6/15. Three patients had dominant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, four had nondominant MCA infarction, one had posterior cerebral artery infarction, and the remaining two had cerebellar infarction. At a mean follow-up period of 7 months, two patients had died (20% mortality), four patients (40%) were vegetative or severely disabled, and the remaining four patients (40%) had mild disability or good outcome. Favorable prognostic factors were younger age (less than 50 years) and good initial GCS score (14 or better).
CONCLUSION: Decompressive craniectomy in the setting of acute brain swelling from cerebral infarction is a life-saving procedure and should be considered in younger patients who have a rapidly deteriorating neurologic status.