Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2024
Capillaroscopic differences between primary Raynaud phenomenon and healthy controls indicate potential microangiopathic involvement in benign vasospasms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brunner-Ziegler Sophie, Dassler Eva, Müller Markus, Pratscher Marco, Forstner Nikolaus Franz-Ferdinand Maria, Koppensteiner Renate, Schlager Oliver, Jilma Bernd
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: For primary Raynaud phenomenon (PRP), an otherwise unexplained vasospastic disposition is assumed. To test the hypothesis of an additional involvement of distinct ultrastructural microvascular alterations, we compared the nailfold capillary pattern of patients with PRP and healthy controls.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients with PRP (with a median duration of vasospastic symptoms of 60 [IQR: 3-120] months) were compared against 125 controls. In both groups, nailfold capillaroscopy was performed to record the presence of dilatations, capillary edema, tortuous capillaries, ramifications, hemorrhages, and reduced capillary density and to determine a semiquantitative rating score. Further, the capacity of finger skin rewarming was investigated by performing infrared thermography in combination with cold provocation.
RESULTS: Unspecific morphologic alterations were found in both, PRP, such as controls, whereby the risk for PRP was four times as high in the presence of capillary dilations (CI: 2.3-7.6) and five times as high if capillary density was reduced (CI: 1.9-13.5). Capillary density correlated with thermoregulatory capacity in both hands in the PRP group, but not in controls. In addition, a negative correlation between the microangiopathy score and the percentage degree of rewarming in both hands was found for patients with PRP only.
CONCLUSION: We found specific differences within the microvascular architecture between patients with PRP and controls. As a conclusion, PRP may not be an entirely benign vasospastic phenomenon, but might be associated with subtle microcirculatory vasculopathy. In addition, we suggest that the implementation of a scoring system might serve as guidance in the diagnostic process at least of patients with long-standing PRP.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients with PRP (with a median duration of vasospastic symptoms of 60 [IQR: 3-120] months) were compared against 125 controls. In both groups, nailfold capillaroscopy was performed to record the presence of dilatations, capillary edema, tortuous capillaries, ramifications, hemorrhages, and reduced capillary density and to determine a semiquantitative rating score. Further, the capacity of finger skin rewarming was investigated by performing infrared thermography in combination with cold provocation.
RESULTS: Unspecific morphologic alterations were found in both, PRP, such as controls, whereby the risk for PRP was four times as high in the presence of capillary dilations (CI: 2.3-7.6) and five times as high if capillary density was reduced (CI: 1.9-13.5). Capillary density correlated with thermoregulatory capacity in both hands in the PRP group, but not in controls. In addition, a negative correlation between the microangiopathy score and the percentage degree of rewarming in both hands was found for patients with PRP only.
CONCLUSION: We found specific differences within the microvascular architecture between patients with PRP and controls. As a conclusion, PRP may not be an entirely benign vasospastic phenomenon, but might be associated with subtle microcirculatory vasculopathy. In addition, we suggest that the implementation of a scoring system might serve as guidance in the diagnostic process at least of patients with long-standing PRP.