MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.117.1.182

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of abnormal psychology · 2008

Updating the contents of working memory in depression: interference from irrelevant negative material.

Joormann Jutta, Gotlib Ian H

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study was designed to assess the effects of irrelevant emotional material on the ability to update the contents of working memory in depression. For each trial, participants were required to memorize 2 lists of emotional words and subsequently to ignore 1 of the lists. The impact of irrelevant emotional material on the ability to update the contents of working memory was indexed by response latencies on a recognition task in which the participants decided whether or not a probe was a member of the relevant list. The authors compared response latencies to probes from the irrelevant list to response latencies to novel probes of the same valence (intrusion effect). The results indicate that, compared to control participants in both neutral and sad mood states, depressed participants showed greater intrusion effects when presented with negative words. In an important finding, intrusion effects for negative words were correlated with self-reported rumination. These findings indicate that depression is associated with difficulties removing irrelevant negative material from working memory. Results also indicate that the increased interference from irrelevant negative material is associated with rumination.

Для цитирования: Joormann Jutta, Gotlib Ian H. Updating the contents of working memory in depression: interference from irrelevant negative material.. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2008. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.117.1.182.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.